Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedApplication dated 28/03/2025 (arising from contempt application filed 29/04/2019)· [2025] KEELC 5053 (KLR)

Odhiambo v Mfangano Division ACC & 2 others (Judicial Review 1 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 5053 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
18 June 2025
1,012 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court dismissed a repeat attempt to escape contempt orders, ruling you cannot re-argue a decided matter—you must appeal instead.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court (Nyagaka J) determined the applicant's Notice of Motion dated 28/03/2025 in which Samwel Okeyo Otindo sought setting aside of a contempt ruling and consequential orders of 25th July 2023, leave to file a supplementary response out of time, and stay of execution of the contempt orders pending hearing. The applicant deponed that he was never served with the order of 27/09/2018 nor with hearing notices, and denied the contempt. The court noted the identical relief had been sought in a prior application dated 03/10/2024 and determined by a ruling delivered on 25/03/2025, which had directed the applicant to appear for mitigation and sentencing. The court applied Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the conjunctive res judicata test endorsed by the Supreme Court in IEBC v Maina Kiai, holding that the same issues between the same parties had been heard and determined on merit, rendering the present application res judicata. Further, the court held the application was an attempt to appeal against its own decision through the backdoor; the proper recourse lay in an appeal to the Court of Appeal under Section 16 of the Environment and Land Court Act and Article 164(3) of the Constitution. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondents, and the matter was set for mention on 2nd July 2025 for the applicant to pay the sum ordered or be imprisoned for contempt.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the application is res judicata

Holding

The application is res judicata because it seeks the same orders as the application dated 03/10/2024, which was determined on the merits in the ruling of 25/03/2025 between the same parties.

Reasoning

The court applied Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act, adopting the Supreme Court's conjunctive test from the IEBC v Maina Kiai case. Both applications sought identical relief - stay of execution, setting aside of the contempt orders, and leave to file supplementary documents - premised on the same grounds of non-service. The issues had been heard and finally determined on merit between the same parties under the same title by a competent court.

p. 2
02

Whether the court can review its own decision on appeal

Holding

An aggrieved party must appeal to the Court of Appeal under Section 16 of the ELC Act and Article 164(3) of the Constitution; the court cannot sit on appeal on its own decision.

Reasoning

The court held that the applicant was attempting an appeal through the backdoor by re-litigating the impugned ruling. Statute and the Constitution provide the mechanism of appeal to the Court of Appeal, which the applicant should have pursued instead of filing the instant application, which also appeared designed to impede the pending sentencing proceedings.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • All elements of res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act must be satisfied conjunctively
  • A court cannot sit on appeal on its own decision; the recourse of an aggrieved party is to appeal
  • Appeals from the Environment and Land Court lie to the Court of Appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 28/03/2025 is dismissed for lack of merit
  2. 2.Costs awarded to the Respondents
  3. 3.Mention on 02nd July 2025 for the applicant to comply by paying the sum ordered or be imprisoned for contempt
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court Act, Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) and Article 164(3) of the Constitution (on appeal routes)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Odhiambo v Mfangano Division ACC & 2 others (Judicial Review 1 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 5053 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Application dated 28/03/2025 (arising from contempt application filed 29/04/2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5053/eng@2025-06-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.