Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC E007/2023 (OS)· [2025] KEELC 4844 (KLR)

Ombe & another (Suing as Administrator of the Estate of Stephen Abur Ombe (Deceased)) v Sule (Sued in his Capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of Richard Sule Awili (Deceased)) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 4844 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 June 2025
730 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court cannot order a stay of execution against a judgment that simply dismissed the plaintiff's case, because there is nothing in it to enforce.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants, whose suit in Kisumu ELC E007 of 2023 (OS) was dismissed with costs on 7th November 2024, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 28th March 2025 under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A and 3B of the Civil Procedure Act. They sought a temporary stay of execution of that judgment pending the hearing and determination of their appeal, Kisumu Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. E028 of 2025, together with an order that the OCS Nyamasaria Police Station enforce the stay, complaining that the Respondent and his agents were moving to evict the Applicant and his tenants without proper eviction orders, thereby rendering the appeal nugatory. The Respondent opposed, contending that no execution was underway and that, the suit having been dismissed, there was nothing to stay. The court perused its own judgment and observed that it merely dismissed the suit with costs and issued no eviction order. Applying Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v Oranga and David Kipruto Chingi v DPP, the court held that a stay cannot lie over a negative order: any eviction steps taken were not execution of the judgment, and the only thing capable of execution would be costs. The application was accordingly dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of execution lies over a negative order

Holding

No. A judgment that merely dismisses a suit with costs is a negative order with nothing to execute or stay, save possibly costs

Reasoning

The court perused its own judgment of 7th November 2024 and confirmed it only dismissed the Applicants' suit with costs; no eviction or other mandatory order was made. Relying on Western College v Oranga and David Kipruto Chingi, the court held there is nothing arising from the judgment to enforce or restrain, so a stay application in respect of it must fail.

p. 2
02

Whether threatened eviction by the Respondent amounts to execution of the judgment

Holding

It does not; eviction steps taken without an eviction order in the judgment are not execution of that judgment

Reasoning

The Applicants' grievance was that the Respondent was moving to evict them pending appeal. The court found that since the judgment contained no eviction order, any eviction steps could not be execution of the judgment and therefore fell outside the scope of Order 42 Rule 6 stay.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An order of stay of execution cannot be granted in respect of a negative order (a judgment merely dismissing a suit with costs)
  • Steps taken towards eviction following a dismissal without an eviction order are not execution of the judgment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 28th March 2025 seeking stay of execution is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to the Respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6 Civil Procedure Rules 2010 and sections 1A and 3B of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ombe & another (Suing as Administrator of the Estate of Stephen Abur Ombe (Deceased)) v Sule (Sued in his Capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of Richard Sule Awili (Deceased)) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 4844 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC E007/2023 (OS). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4844/eng@2025-06-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.