Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment (originating summons dated 3/6/24)· [2025] KEELC 4574 (KLR)

Mukhongo & 8 others v Mbevo Investment Limited & 6 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E037 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 4574 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 April 2025
2,572 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st - 8th Plaintiffs, owners of eight flats erected on Land Reference Number 209/11342 (Original Number 209/10505/3) I.R No. 57798 in South C, Nairobi, filed an originating summons dated 3/6/24 seeking orders compelling the directors of the 1st Defendant (the developer) to transfer the reversionary leasehold interest in the title to the 9th Plaintiff, a company they incorporated to hold the reversionary interest and manage common areas. The Plaintiffs purchased the flats in the 1990s (the last in 2004) under sale agreements and subleases under which they paid Kshs 1,000 each for their proportionate share of the reversionary interest and for a share in the 6th Defendant, the intended management company. The 1st and 6th Defendants never transferred the shares or the reversionary interest, and the directors' whereabouts became unknown; only the 7th Defendant entered appearance. The suit was heard undefended, with the evidence of Christian Dominic Alukwe Witila reliance on his supporting affidavit. The court held that although undefended, the Plaintiffs bore the burden of proof, and found unchallenged evidence that all flats were sold and full consideration paid, that the lease required transfer of the reversionary interest within 60 days of the last registration (i.e. by 20/8/2004), and that a certified search showed the title still registered in the 1st Defendant's name. Judgment was entered for the Plaintiffs with orders for execution of the transfer, default execution by the Deputy Registrar, registration without production of the original title, surrender of the original certificate or issue of a provisional certificate. No orders as to costs were made, the suit being undefended.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiffs, having paid for the reversionary interest and shares in the management company, are entitled to have the reversionary leasehold interest transferred to their company

Holding

Yes - the Plaintiffs proved on a balance of probabilities that they purchased and paid for the reversionary interest, the Defendants breached the sale agreement and sublease by failing to transfer it, and it must now be transferred to the 9th Plaintiff

Reasoning

The court found unchallenged evidence that the 1st Defendant developed and sold all 8 flats (last in 2004), that the sale agreements and lease required transfer of the reversionary interest to the management company by 20/8/2004, that purchasers paid the consideration, and that a certified search showed the title still in the 1st Defendant's name. Absent transfer, the Plaintiffs' ownership of the flats is incomplete.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Even in an undefended suit, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving its case on a balance of probabilities

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The directors of the 1st Defendant to execute a transfer of the reversionary leasehold interest in Land Reference Number 209/11342 (Original Number 209/10505/3) I.R No. 57798 in favour of the 9th Plaintiff and cause it to be registered within 30 days of the order
  2. 2.In default of execution by the directors of the 1st Defendant, the Deputy Registrar of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi to execute all documents required to effect the transfer to the 9th Plaintiff
  3. 3.If the directors fail to avail the Original Certificate of title, the Land Registrar to register the reversionary interest in favour of the 9th Plaintiff without production of the Original Certificate of Title and make such other register entries as would give effect to the orders
  4. 4.The directors of the 1st Defendant to surrender the Original Certificate to the Plaintiffs' Advocates
  5. 5.If the directors fail to avail the Original Certificate of title, the Land Registrar to issue a provisional Certificate of Title for the suit property with reversionary interest registered in favour of the 9th Plaintiff
  6. 6.No orders as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes (Environment and Land Court Act); originating summons procedure

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mukhongo & 8 others v Mbevo Investment Limited & 6 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E037 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 4574 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment (originating summons dated 3/6/24). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4574/eng@2025-04-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.