Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherNot stated in the ruling (three Notices of Motion dated 5th November 2024, 13th November 2024 and 15th November 2024)· [2025] KEELC 4396 (KLR)

Dembena International Limited v National Land Commission; National Bank of Kenya (Garnishee) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 4396 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
12 June 2025
3,834 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Judgment was entered on 30th May 2024 in favour of the Decree Holder against the National Land Commission for Kshs. 503,207,157.00, the balance of a compensation award for compulsory acquisition of land (LR No. Nairobi/Block X8/X8, South C) for the Nairobi Expressway, with interest. Three applications followed. The Decree Holder sought a garnishee order nisi, later to be made absolute, against NLC accounts at National Bank of Kenya, Hill Plaza Branch (an Order Nisi issued on 7th November 2024), and separately sought to cite the NLC and its Secretary/CEO, Chairman and Director Finance for contempt for non-payment. The NLC sought to set aside the Order Nisi, contending that its accounts hold funds in trust for other government agencies for compensation of project affected persons, and that execution against it must follow Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act. The court framed two issues: whether the Decree Holder complied with Section 21 and Order 29 Rule 2(2)(c) before initiating contempt, and whether the Order Nisi should be set aside or made absolute. Holding the NLC to be a government entity under Article 260, and associating with Five Star Agencies (Court of Appeal), Tom Ojienda & Associates and Kisya Investments, the court found the garnishee proceedings premature and incompetent and the contempt citation premature. It set aside the Order Nisi as null and void, released the Garnishee, dismissed the Decree Holder's two applications, allowed the NLC's application, and directed each party to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether contempt proceedings against NLC officers were premature for non-compliance with Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act and Order 29 Rule 2(2)(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Holding

Yes - contempt proceedings were premature as the Decree holder had not exhausted the statutory execution procedure

Reasoning

The court noted the NLC is a government entity under Article 260 of the Constitution. Section 21 prescribes the exclusive mode of executing decrees against government: certificate of order, service on the Attorney-General, payment by the Accounting Officer. Since the Decree holder did not dispute non-adherence to that procedure, contempt could not yet lie; willful disobedience could not be established where the statutory route to mandamus had not been followed.

p. 7
02

Whether the Garnishee Order Nisi issued on 7th November 2024 should be set aside

Holding

Yes - the Order Nisi was incompetent, null and void because garnishee proceedings do not apply in execution against the Government

Reasoning

Relying on Section 21(4) of the Government Proceedings Act, Five Star Agencies (Court of Appeal) and Tom Ojienda & Associates v Nairobi City County, the court held that Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules does not apply to execution against State organs. The rationale of protecting public coffers applied even where the NLC held funds for project affected persons; the funds still emanate from public sources. The Order Nisi was therefore set aside and the Garnishee released.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • No execution or attachment, including garnishee proceedings, may issue against the Government except in strict compliance with Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act
  • Contempt proceedings against government officers cannot be initiated before the Section 21 procedure (certificate of order, mandamus) is exhausted

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Decree holder's Notice of Motion dated 5th November 2024 (garnishee order absolute) is disallowed/dismissed
  2. 2.The Decree holder's Notice of Motion dated 13th November 2024 (contempt citations) is disallowed/dismissed
  3. 3.The Judgement debtor's Notice of Motion dated 15th November 2024 is allowed
  4. 4.The Garnishee Order Nisi issued on 7th November 2024 is set aside as incompetent, null and void, and the Garnishee is released
  5. 5.Each party to bear their own costs of the three applications
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over execution/contempt applications arising from its own decree, including the garnishee applications and the application to set aside the Order Nisi

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dembena International Limited v National Land Commission; National Bank of Kenya (Garnishee) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 4396 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the ruling (three Notices of Motion dated 5th November 2024, 13th November 2024 and 15th November 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4396/eng@2025-06-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.