Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherPetition dated 29th November 2024· [2025] KEELC 4225 (KLR)

Seroney v Land Registrar, Kapsabet Lands Office & another; Silverland Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition E005 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 4225 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
3 June 2025
719 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed you can withdraw your own case anytime before judgment, and the court declined to punish that choice with costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court (G M A Ongondo, J) dealt with a Notice of withdrawal dated 25th April 2025 filed by the petitioner, Zipporah Jebichii Seroney, under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, seeking to withdraw her petition dated 29th November 2024. The petition had sought, inter alia, a declaration that there was a valid transfer of land parcel LR Nandi/Chekumia/502 from the petitioner to the interested party, and an order of certiorari quashing the 1st Respondent's decision cancelling the interested party's ownership of the land. The interested party opposed the withdrawal, arguing there was no application for withdrawal, no reasons were given, and its title risked cancellation without a hearing; it sought that the petition be heard to conclusion and that it be awarded costs, having filed a replying affidavit sworn on 17th February 2025. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr Sang, urged that the withdrawal was on the petitioner's instructions, invoked the overriding objective, and requested no orders as to costs. The court held that under Order 25 a petitioner has the right to discontinue proceedings at any stage prior to judgment, applying the Supreme Court's decision in re Council of Governors, and guided by sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act. The notice of withdrawal was found valid, and the entire petition was marked as withdrawn with no orders as to costs. Service on the interested parties was confirmed by affidavit of service sworn on 30th May 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a petitioner may withdraw a petition as of right before judgment

Holding

Yes, under Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules a petitioner may discontinue at any stage prior to judgment, and the withdrawal should be permitted

Reasoning

Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in re Council of Governors, the court held that the right to withdraw proceedings is a matter of right and cannot be taken away, consistent with the constitutional principle of alternative dispute resolution under Article 159. Guided by sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and the Environment and Land Court Act, the court found the notice of withdrawal valid.

p. 2
02

What is the effect of an permitted withdrawal on the petition

Holding

The petition is marked withdrawn in its entirety with no orders as to costs

Reasoning

Following Rai & 3 others v Rai & 4 others, and applying the overriding objective, the court marked the whole petition as withdrawn without costs, meaning the substantive dispute over LR Nandi/Chekumia/502 remains unresolved in this petition though a fresh suit may be filed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A party has a right to withdraw or discontinue proceedings at any stage prior to judgment, and withdrawal takes effect once the court permits it

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of withdrawal dated 25th April 2025 is declared sound or valid
  2. 2.The petition in its entirety is marked as withdrawn with no orders as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) and sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act 2015; Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Seroney v Land Registrar, Kapsabet Lands Office & another; Silverland Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition E005 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 4225 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Petition dated 29th November 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4225/eng@2025-06-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.