Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in excerpt· [2025] KEELC 4018 (KLR)

Oketch v Hussein & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 2141 of 2007) [2025] KEELC 4018 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 May 2025
2,316 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court set aside a 2021 default judgment in a land dispute, letting the defendants finally present their defence, but ordered them to pay the plaintiff's costs first.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st and 2nd defendants moved the court by notice of motion dated 11th July 2024 seeking amendment of the 1st defendant's name, setting aside the default judgment delivered on 17th June 2021 together with the consequent decree, and a temporary injunction restraining interference with their possession of Nairobi/Block 63/6X7. The applicants contended they only learnt of the suit when served with an eviction application, that service was defective - effected on a wrong name (Hassan Ali Hussein rather than Dr. Hassan Mohammed Adam) and at a wrong address - and that they had a strong defence including first-registration protection against a letter of allotment. The plaintiff opposed, asserting substituted service (including a newspaper advertisement) at the address on the official search and title, which the 2nd defendant herself uses. The 4th defendant's Acting County Solicitor submitted that diligence in service was questionable and the issues merited a hearing on merit. The court framed the test under Order 10 Rule 11, applying Mwala v Kenya Bureau of Standards on regular versus irregular judgments and Shah v Mbogo on the discretionary grounds. It held the judgment regular: the postal address used for service was unrefuted and the name discrepancy unsubstantiated. Nonetheless, exercising its discretion because the annexed draft defence and counterclaim raises triable issues, the court set aside the 17th June 2021 judgment, deemed the defence and counterclaim filed upon payment of filing fees, and awarded the plaintiff the costs of the application, payable by the 2nd defendant before the matter is set down for hearing. The injunction and name-amendment prayers were not granted in the final orders.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the default judgment of 17th June 2021 was regular or irregular

Holding

The court found the judgment regular, being satisfied that service of summons and pleadings was properly effected.

Reasoning

The applicant alleged service was defective because it was effected on a wrong name (Hassan Ali Hussein) and wrong address. The court found the postal address P.O. Box 220 Wajir appears in the title and official search and was unrefuted. The claim that the correct name is Hassan Mohammed Adam was unsubstantiated, with no documents proving the alleged paternal relationship.

p. 4
02

Whether the court should exercise its discretion to set aside the regular default judgment

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to set aside the judgment because the draft defence and counterclaim raises triable issues that can only be tested at trial.

Reasoning

Applying the Shah v Mbogo principle that discretion exists to avoid injustice from accident, inadvertence or excusable mistake, the court held that doing justice required giving all parties a chance to ventilate their claims, even though the defence was an afterthought filed without leave. Costs thus far were awarded to the plaintiff.

p. 5
03

Status of the draft defence and counterclaim filed without leave

Holding

The draft defence and counterclaim dated 28th October 2024 was deemed duly filed subject to payment of requisite filing fees.

Reasoning

Although no prayer for leave to file the defence was sought, making it an afterthought, the court found it raised triable issues and deemed it filed, subject to payment of filing fees, in the interest of justice.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A regular ex parte judgment may be set aside in the court's discretion to avoid injustice, considering a draft defence that raises triable issues.
  • An irregular judgment, obtained without proper service, ought to be set aside ex debito justitiae.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The judgment delivered by this court on 17th June, 2021 is hereby set aside
  2. 2.The draft statement of defence and counter claim dated 28th October, 2024 is deemed as duly filed subject to payment of the requisite filing fees
  3. 3.The plaintiff/respondent is entitled to costs of this application to be borne by the 2nd defendant/applicant, to be paid before the matter is set down for hearing

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 48, 50(1), 159
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 8 Rule 3, Order 10 Rule 11, Order 51 Rules 1 and 3
  • Land Registration ActSection 28

Cases cited (8)

  • George Stephen Macharia v Issa Njawiri Jabiri & 2 others
    [2021] eKLR
  • Phillip Mutiso Mulalya v Samuel Dominic Muathe & 2 others
    [2022] eKLR
  • Tree Shade Motors Limited v D.T Dobie and Company (K) Limited & another
    CA 38 of 1998
  • Ephraim Njugu Njeru v Justin Bedan Njoka Muturi & 2 others
    [2006] eKLR
  • Sebei District Administration v Gasyali
    [1968] EA 300, 301-302
  • Port Services Ltd v Mobay Under Sea Tours Ltd & Firemains Fund Insurance Co.
    SCCA 18/2001
  • Shah v Mbogo
    [1969] EA 116 (also cited as (1960) EA 166)
  • Mwala v Kenya Bureau of Standards
    EALR [2001] 1 EA 148
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 48, 50(1) and 159 of the Constitution; Sections 1A, 1B, 3A Civil Procedure Act; Order 8 Rule 3, Order 10 Rule 11 and Order 51 Rules 1 and 3 Civil Procedure Rules; Section 28 Land Registration Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Oketch v Hussein & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 2141 of 2007) [2025] KEELC 4018 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4018/eng@2025-05-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.