Chepwambok & another v Chepkemboi (Environment & Land Case 6 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 3927 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Environment and Land Court refused to throw out an unserved report, instead pausing testimony so the other side could get the document and prepare cross-examination.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether production of an unserved document (the NRB Report) through PW4 amounted to trial by ambush
The objection partially succeeded: the witness was stood down and the plaintiff ordered to supply the documents so the defendant could cross-examine, rather than the evidence being excluded
The court accepted that the DCIO Report in the plaintiffs' list of documents refers to NRB extracts. The defendant was entitled to those documents under constitutional fair-hearing guarantees. Rather than excluding the NRB Report, the court accommodated both the plaintiff's production of evidence and the defendant's right to test it by cross-examination, standing the witness down.
Legal principles established
#- A party has the right to be supplied with documents a witness intends to produce, grounded in fair hearing rights
- The right to be heard is fundamental and permeates the entire justice system
Court orders
#- 1.PW4 is stood down to 27th day of May 2025 for further hearing
- 2.Learned counsel for the plaintiffs to supply the defendant's counsel with all documents relating to extracts and information indicated in the DCIO Report within today
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act 2015 as read with sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Chepwambok & another v Chepkemboi (Environment & Land Case 6 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 3927 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3927/eng@2025-05-21
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.