Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNotice of Motion dated 17th October, 2023· [2025] KEELC 3920 (KLR)

Dhanji & 3 others v Dhanji; Borkhataria (Applicant) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 203 of 2013) [2025] KEELC 3920 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 May 2025
2,785 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out an application because a Tanzanian estate grant was never resealed by Kenya's High Court, meaning it had no legal force here.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a Notice of Motion dated 17th October 2023 in which Bhavin Jayantilal Borkhataria sought leave for the firm of Sonal Raval Advocate to come on record after judgment for the 2nd Applicant, and to be substituted as a party in place of the deceased 2nd Applicant, Jayantilal Dhanji Borkhataria, who died on 24th July 2020. The Applicant relied on a grant of letters of administration issued in Tanzania and asserted that post-judgment negotiations over a judgment delivered on 26th November 2018 were ongoing. The 1st and 2nd Applicants/Respondents opposed the Motion through Grounds of Opposition, arguing it was defective, an abuse of process, that no suit was pending, and that the foreign grant had not been resealed. The court framed three issues: competence of the application, whether substitution was merited, and whether new counsel could come on record. It held that failure to cite specific sub-rules did not render the Motion incompetent, and that facts in the affidavit stood uncontroverted since the Respondents relied only on Grounds of Opposition. The court accepted that substitution is not mandatory at the execution stage, since Order 24 Rule 10 excludes execution proceedings, but held that an applicant electing to substitute must prove legal representative status. The Tanzanian grant, not being resealed under Section 77(1) of the Law of Succession Act, had no legal effect in Kenya. A resealed grant tendered only through submissions was disregarded, as submissions are not evidence. Finding the Applicant lacked locus standi, the court struck out the Motion with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competence of the Motion for failure to disclose specific sub-rules relied on

Holding

The Motion is not incompetent; failure to cite specific sub-rules or even citing wrong provisions does not invalidate an application.

Reasoning

Order 51 Rule 1 provides that failure to state the provision relied on does not warrant dismissal, and an application cannot be defeated for want of form where substance is unaffected. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Hermanus Phillipus Steyn to hold that procedural provisions should not be interpreted as cast in stone.

p. 3
02

Effect of relying solely on Grounds of Opposition

Holding

Facts deponed in the Applicant's affidavit stand uncontroverted since Grounds of Opposition raise only issues of law.

Reasoning

Following Daniel Kibet Mutai vs Attorney General, affidavits are sworn evidence on a higher pedestal than Grounds of Opposition. Allegations of contested facts and denial of post-judgment negotiations were disregarded because they were raised only in the Grounds of Opposition without a replying affidavit.

p. 3
03

Whether substitution of the deceased party is required at post-judgment stage

Holding

Substitution is not mandatory at execution stage, but a party electing to substitute must prove legal representative status; rights under a decree devolve to the estate.

Reasoning

Order 24 Rule 10 excludes execution proceedings from rules 3, 4 and 7 on substitution. Following Agnes Wanjiku Wang'ondu and Mueni Kiamba, the court held decree rights do not abate on death but devolve on the estate. However, where substitution is elected, the applicant must demonstrate requisite legal authority under the Law of Succession Act.

p. 4
04

Efficacy of the Tanzanian grant and locus standi of the Applicant

Holding

The foreign grant had no legal effect in Kenya absent resealing, so the Applicant lacked standing; the resealed grant annexed to submissions was disregarded as inadmissible.

Reasoning

Section 77(1) of the Law of Succession Act requires a foreign grant to be resealed by the High Court to have force in Kenya. At filing, the Applicant conceded the grant was not resealed. Counsel's later assertion of resealing, evidenced only in submissions, could not aid him since submissions are not evidence, per Daniel Torotich Arap Moi.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A foreign grant of probate or administration has no legal effect in Kenya until resealed by the High Court under Section 77(1) of the Law of Succession Act.
  • Submissions are not pleadings and cannot take the place of evidence; documents supporting a case must be introduced through affidavit.
  • It is not mandatory to substitute a deceased decree holder or judgment debtor at the execution stage, as Order 24 Rule 10 excludes execution proceedings from the substitution rules.
  • Failure to cite the specific sub-rule under which an application is brought does not render the application incompetent.
  • Grounds of Opposition address only issues of law and do not controvert sworn facts in an affidavit.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 17th October, 2023 is struck out with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act, Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, and Orders 9 and 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dhanji & 3 others v Dhanji; Borkhataria (Applicant) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 203 of 2013) [2025] KEELC 3920 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 17th October, 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3920/eng@2025-05-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.