Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Appeal (Judgment of 14th March 2024; Notice of Motion dated 3rd April 2024)· [2025] KEELC 3820 (KLR)

Kitonga & 2 others v Hashtag Biz Hub Co. Limited (Environment and Land Appeal 67 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 3820 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 May 2025
2,810 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court refused to review its judgment or stop execution because Hashtagbiz Hub could not show a pending appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent, Hashtagbiz Hub Company Ltd, moved the Environment and Land Court by Notice of Motion dated 3rd April 2024 seeking review of the court's judgment of 14th March 2024 to include an order staying execution of that judgment pending hearing of Court of Appeal Case Number E327 of 2021, and stay of execution. The application was supported by an affidavit of Joseph Njenga Kiarie, who alleged non-disclosure by the Appellants of a pending appeal and harassment, threats and eviction of the Respondent's tenants. The Appellants opposed through a Replying Affidavit sworn by the 1st Appellant, contending that E327 of 2021 was a civil application for stay of Justice Obaga's ruling, determined on 16th December 2022, and that no record of appeal existed; thus there was nothing to review. The court framed two issues: whether it should review its judgment, and whether it should stay execution. Relying on Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court held there was no error apparent on the face of the record: the Court of Appeal application had been finalised on 16th December 2022, and the exhibited Memorandum of Appeal was for an intended appeal whose reliefs the court had already granted by setting aside the magistrate's ruling. Stay was also refused, as no pending appeal was proved, stay being a preservation remedy pending appeal. The application was dismissed with costs to the Appellants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court should review its judgment of 14th March 2024

Holding

The application for review failed; the alleged non-disclosure of a pending appeal was not an error apparent on the face of the record because no substantive appeal was pending - Civil Appeal (Application) No. 327 of 2021 had been determined on 16th December 2022, and the Memorandum of Appeal exhibited was for an intended appeal only.

Reasoning

The court examined Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which allow review on discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, without unreasonable delay. It found the Respondent's own annexures showed the Court of Appeal application was disposed of on 16th December 2022 and the memorandum of appeal related to an intended appeal whose reliefs had already been achieved by the judgment of 14th March 2024. There was thus no pending appeal and no error to correct.

p. 6
02

Whether the court should stay execution of its judgment of 14th March 2024

Holding

Stay was refused because the Respondent did not establish that any appeal was pending before the Court of Appeal.

Reasoning

The court held that stay of execution orders preserve the subject matter pending determination of an appeal. Since the existence and pendency of an appeal against the judgment was not established, and the Respondent had not appealed nor indicated an intention to appeal, there were no grounds for stay.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • An error apparent on the face of the record must be evident and does not require extraneous proof
  • Stay of execution is granted to preserve the subject matter pending determination of an appeal; without a pending appeal there is no basis for stay
  • Review under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 requires new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, and must be made without unreasonable delay

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 3rd April 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application shall be borne by the Respondent/Applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 28, 40, 47(1), 159(2)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSections 23(7), 18
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 45 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 80
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)
  • Law of Contracts ActSection 3(3)

Cases cited (7)

  • Manchester Outfitters Limited & 2 Others vs Galot Holdings Limited & 3 others
    [2024] KEELC 6029 (KLR)
  • Grace Akinyi vs Gladys Kemunto Obiri & Another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Silvester Muema Musyoka vs Anna Kamanthe Nyamai & another
    [2021] eKLR
  • Caltex Oil (K) Limited vs Rono Limited
    [2016] eKLR
  • Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Health vs Aura & 13 other
    [2024] KECA 2 eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited vs Shampole Group Ranch & Another
    [2014] eKLR
  • Apollo Waswa Basude & 2 Others (As administrators to the Estate of the late Sepiriya Rosiko) vs Nsabwa Ham
    Civil Appeal No 288 of 2016
On appeal from
Chief Magistrates' Court, Milimani
CMCC 4665 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 28, 40, 47(1) and 159(2) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010; Sections 23(7) and 18 of the Environment and Land Court Act; Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kitonga & 2 others v Hashtag Biz Hub Co. Limited (Environment and Land Appeal 67 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 3820 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Appeal (Judgment of 14th March 2024; Notice of Motion dated 3rd April 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3820/eng@2025-05-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.