Kitonga & 2 others v Hashtag Biz Hub Co. Limited (Environment and Land Appeal 67 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 3820 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Environment and Land Court refused to review its judgment or stop execution because Hashtagbiz Hub could not show a pending appeal.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the court should review its judgment of 14th March 2024
The application for review failed; the alleged non-disclosure of a pending appeal was not an error apparent on the face of the record because no substantive appeal was pending - Civil Appeal (Application) No. 327 of 2021 had been determined on 16th December 2022, and the Memorandum of Appeal exhibited was for an intended appeal only.
The court examined Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which allow review on discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, without unreasonable delay. It found the Respondent's own annexures showed the Court of Appeal application was disposed of on 16th December 2022 and the memorandum of appeal related to an intended appeal whose reliefs had already been achieved by the judgment of 14th March 2024. There was thus no pending appeal and no error to correct.
Whether the court should stay execution of its judgment of 14th March 2024
Stay was refused because the Respondent did not establish that any appeal was pending before the Court of Appeal.
The court held that stay of execution orders preserve the subject matter pending determination of an appeal. Since the existence and pendency of an appeal against the judgment was not established, and the Respondent had not appealed nor indicated an intention to appeal, there were no grounds for stay.
Legal principles established
#- An error apparent on the face of the record must be evident and does not require extraneous proof
- Stay of execution is granted to preserve the subject matter pending determination of an appeal; without a pending appeal there is no basis for stay
- Review under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 requires new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, and must be made without unreasonable delay
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated 3rd April 2024 is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the application shall be borne by the Respondent/Applicant
- On appeal from
- Chief Magistrates' Court, Milimani
- CMCC 4665 of 2019
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 28, 40, 47(1) and 159(2) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010; Sections 23(7) and 18 of the Environment and Land Court Act; Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kitonga & 2 others v Hashtag Biz Hub Co. Limited (Environment and Land Appeal 67 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 3820 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Appeal (Judgment of 14th March 2024; Notice of Motion dated 3rd April 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3820/eng@2025-05-15
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.