Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissednot stated in the judgment text provided· [2025] KEELC 3795 (KLR)

Erdermann Property v London Distillers (K) Limited & another (Environment and Land Appeal 2 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 3795 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
13 May 2025
1,240 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed you cannot raise a new claim like perjury for the first time on appeal if you never pleaded it earlier.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Machakos against a judgment of the National Environmental Tribunal (NET) delivered on 30/09/2020, in which NET had dismissed an appeal against the issuance of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) license and ordered each party to bear its own costs. The appellant, who had succeeded before the 2nd respondent (NEMA) but lost before NET, raised three grounds: that NET failed to hold Benjamin Langwen, the 1st respondent's expert, liable for perjury regarding public consultation; that the 1st respondent abused the civil legal process by bringing a claim without reasonable or probable cause; and that the appellant should have been awarded costs on a full indemnity basis. The appellant also sought a finding of guilt against Langwen, committal proceedings against him and the 1st respondent's directors, and costs both before NET and in this appeal. The court, per Koross J, held that the perjury ground was a new ground introduced on appeal: it was never pleaded, canvassed, or made an issue before NET, and relying on Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v National Bank of Kenya Limited and Kenya Hotels Limited v Oriental Commercial Bank Limited, the court declined to entertain it. Since grounds (b) and (c) were hinged on ground (a), they equally failed. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit, the NET judgment was upheld, and each party was ordered to bear their respective costs of the appeal. The 2nd respondent did not participate in the proceedings.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a party may raise perjury as a new ground on appeal when it was never pleaded before the tribunal

Holding

No; ground (a) fails as a new ground introduced on appeal

Reasoning

The appellant had a duty to specifically plead perjury before NET, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witness. Following Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v National Bank of Kenya Limited and Kenya Hotels Limited v Oriental Commercial Bank Limited, grounds of appeal must arise from issues sufficiently pleaded and canvassed at trial. Having failed to raise it, the appellant cannot raise it at this late stage.

p. 3
02

Whether the derivative grounds of abuse of process and full indemnity costs could stand

Holding

They fail with ground (a), being wholly dependent on it

Reasoning

The appellant's own submissions collapsed the grounds into one interconnected scheme, with ground (a) having a domino effect on the others. Once ground (a) was rejected as a new ground on appeal, grounds (b) and (c), which were hinged on it, necessarily failed, and the appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A new point not pleaded, canvassed or raised at trial should not be allowed to be taken on appeal unless the evidence establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the facts before the trial court, if fully investigated, would support the point
  • An appellate court may only consider evidence that formed part of the record below

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.The judgment of NET delivered on 30/09/2020 is upheld
  3. 3.Each party shall bear their respective costs of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act (EMCA)not specified

Cases cited (2)

  • Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v National Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2020] eKLR
  • Kenya Hotels Limited v Oriental Commercial Bank Limited
    [2018] KECA 692 (KLR)
On appeal from
National Environmental Tribunal (NET)
not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
Statutory appeal from the National Environmental Tribunal (provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Erdermann Property v London Distillers (K) Limited & another (Environment and Land Appeal 2 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 3795 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). not stated in the judgment text provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3795/eng@2025-05-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.