Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in excerpt· [2025] KEELC 3612 (KLR)

Mungai v Njoroge, Githua, Waithaka and Kinuu (All sued in their capacity as joint liquidation of Kenya Planters Cooperative Union Limited) & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 8 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 3612 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 May 2025
921 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court dismissed a stay bid because the applicant proved only one of three required conditions.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Murang'a (M.N. Gicheru, J) determines a notice of motion dated 10-11-2024 by the 2nd Defendant seeking stay of execution of the judgment and decree of 7-11-2024, which had ordered its eviction from the suit land, pending an intended appeal (Court of Appeal Nyeri Appeal No. E218 of 2024). The application was brought under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, supported by affidavits of Joel Kibe, a director, who argued that the appeal would be rendered nugatory and that the Plaintiff would suffer no prejudice. The Plaintiff opposed, showing that a decree had been issued and the 2nd Defendant had already been evicted by Chador Auctioneers on 15-11-2024 in the presence of the OCS Kaguku Police Station, and that the 2nd Defendant was degrading the land through quarrying. The court framed three issues: substantial loss, unreasonable delay, and security. It found no delay (the motion was filed within three days), but held that substantial loss was not proved - the affidavits were scanty and uncontroverted evidence showed the 2nd Defendant was merely degrading the land - and that no security was offered. All three conditions being cumulative, the motion failed. The court dismissed the motion with costs on 6 May 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 2nd Defendant proved substantial loss

Holding

Not proved; the affidavits were scanty and uncontroverted evidence showed degradation of the land through quarrying

Reasoning

The supporting and supplementary affidavits by Joel Kibe did not describe any activities or improvements on the land at stake. Instead, the Plaintiff produced uncontroverted evidence that the 2nd Defendant was degrading the suit land through quarrying, so continued occupation served exploitation rather than preservation pending appeal.

p. 2
02

Whether the application was filed without unreasonable delay

Holding

Yes; the motion was filed within three days of the judgment

Reasoning

Judgment was delivered on 7-11-2024 and the motion dated 10-11-2024 was filed within three days, satisfying the second condition for stay under Order 42 rule 6.

p. 2
03

Whether security for due performance of the decree was provided

Holding

No security was offered in the grounds or affidavits

Reasoning

Nothing in the seven grounds or the two affidavits offered security for due performance of the decree. The court could have imposed conditions but found it unnecessary since the motion already failed on substantial loss.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • All three prerequisites for stay of execution pending appeal must be fulfilled; failure of one defeats the motion

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the notice of motion dated November 10, 2024
  2. 2.Costs of the motion to the Plaintiff
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 rule 6 Civil Procedure Rules; Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mungai v Njoroge, Githua, Waithaka and Kinuu (All sued in their capacity as joint liquidation of Kenya Planters Cooperative Union Limited) & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 8 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 3612 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3612/eng@2025-05-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.