Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 2nd July 2024)· [2025] KEELC 2872 (KLR)

Njuguna & 13 others v Faidisha Pamoja Housing Co-operative Society Limited & 5 others (Environment & Land Case E049 of 2020) [2025] KEELC 2872 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 March 2025
1,552 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court struck out land buyers' bid to stop a lender selling their plots, ruling that loan and charge disputes belong in the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiffs/applicants moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 2nd July 2024 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the 2nd defendant/respondent, a lender, from entering, selling, auctioning or transferring Plot No. Mavoko Town Block 3/9299 or sixteen plots they purchased from the 1st respondent between 2019 and 2022. The applicants alleged they received certificates of ownership and vacant possession but no titles, and discovered the mother title was withheld on account of a Kshs. 5,400,000/= loan to the 1st respondent secured by a charge over the suit property, with a statutory notice of Kshs. 8,621,911/= issued on 20th March 2024. They alleged fraud by the 1st and 3rd to 6th defendants and reported the matter to the DCI. The 2nd respondent opposed, contending the court lacked jurisdiction over what was a commercial dispute concerning exercise of its statutory power of sale following the 1st respondent's loan default, and that the plaintiffs, not being privy to the loan agreement or charge, had no direct claim against it. The court framed two issues: jurisdiction and the injunction threshold. Relying on Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lilian S', Samuel Kamau Macharia and Cooperative Bank v Kangethe, the court held that disputes over charges and statutory power of sale are not incidental to land use and fall outside the ELC's jurisdiction. Finding the matter commercial, the court struck out the application with costs to the 2nd defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC over disputes concerning charges and statutory power of sale

Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction; the dispute is commercial in nature as the plaintiffs have no apparent claim against the chargee and only complain of fraud by the 1st defendant's officials

Reasoning

The undisputed facts were that the 1st defendant obtained a loan of Kshs. 5,400,000/= secured by a charge over the suit property registered in its name, and defaulted. The plaintiffs did not contest the legality of the chargee's power of sale against the 1st defendant; their complaint was fraud by the 1st defendant's officials. Following Cooperative Bank v Kangethe, such charge-related disputes fall outside the ELC's land-use jurisdiction and belong to the High Court.

02

Whether the plaintiffs met the threshold for a temporary injunction

Holding

Not determined - the application was struck out for want of jurisdiction before reaching the merits

Reasoning

Having found that it lacked jurisdiction, the court did not consider the Giella-style thresholds of prima facie case, irreparable harm and balance of convenience. The jurisdictional question was resolved first, in line with the principle that jurisdiction is everything and must be established before a court takes any further step.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction flows from the Constitution or statute and a court cannot arrogate to itself jurisdiction it does not have
  • Disputes arising in respect of charges/mortgages and exercise of statutory power of sale do not fall within the ELC's jurisdiction, which is limited to matters incidental to land use; such matters fall within the High Court's jurisdiction

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Struck out the plaintiffs' application dated 2nd July 2024 for want of jurisdiction
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the 2nd defendant
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court Act - jurisdiction limited to disputes incidental to land use; court found matter commercial and outside its jurisdiction

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njuguna & 13 others v Faidisha Pamoja Housing Co-operative Society Limited & 5 others (Environment & Land Case E049 of 2020) [2025] KEELC 2872 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 2nd July 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/2872/eng@2025-03-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.