Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNairobi CMCC No. E431 of 2023 (Appeal arising therefrom)· [2025] KEELC 1484 (KLR)

Muguika & 2 others v Consolidated Bank of Kenya Limited & another (Environment and Land Appeal E011 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 1484 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 March 2025
916 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court struck out a bank borrower's appeal because disputes about enforcing a charge over land belong in the High Court, not the ELC.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Appellants appealed against a ruling of Hon. Wendy K. Micheni (CM) delivered on 2nd July 2023 in Nairobi CMCC No. E431 of 2023, dismissing their application for injunction seeking to restrain the 1st Respondent, the Consolidated Bank of Kenya, from exercising its statutory power of sale over Land Reference Number 13324/49 (I.R No. 42640), which the 1st and 3rd Appellants had charged as security for a Ksh.20 million loan advanced to the 2nd Appellant. The 1st Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 1st August 2024 contending that the Environment and Land Court lacked jurisdiction over disputes relating to Charges, its jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act being confined to use, occupation and title to land. The Appellants, though served, filed neither a response nor submissions. Applying the Mukhisa Biscuit definition of a preliminary objection and the Court of Appeal's holdings in Cooperative Bank v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna (that charging land does not connote land use) and Kenya Ports Authority v Modern Holdings (that jurisdiction may be raised at any stage), the court held that the fulcrum of the appeal was the enforcement of a Charge, a commercial dispute outside its jurisdiction. The Notice of Preliminary Objection was found merited, and the Appeal was struck out with costs to the 1st Respondent, the court observing that the Appellants should have instituted the appeal in the High Court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELC has jurisdiction over an appeal whose fulcrum is the enforcement of a Charge over land

Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction; the dispute is commercial in nature concerning charges, not use, occupation or title to land. The appeal should have been filed in the High Court.

Reasoning

Relying on Cooperative Bank v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna, the court held that charged land is not land use. The ELC's jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the ELC Act covers use, occupation and title to land. Since the appeal revolved around a Charge and an intended auction, it fell outside the ELC's jurisdiction and the appellants should have gone to the High Court.

p. 3
02

Whether a preliminary objection is a proper mechanism to challenge jurisdiction

Holding

Yes - jurisdiction is a pure point of law suitable for a preliminary objection under the Mukhisa Biscuit definition.

Reasoning

The court adopted the classic Mukhisa Biscuit formulation that a preliminary objection raises a pure point of law on assumed pleaded facts. A challenge to jurisdiction qualifies, and per Kenya Ports Authority v Modern Holdings may be raised at any stage.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Charging of land does not connote land use within the ELC's jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b)
  • Jurisdiction may be raised at any stage of proceedings, including on appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal struck out with costs to the 1st Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b); Article 260
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13

Cases cited (5)

  • Mukhisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd Vs West End Distributors Company Limited
    (1969) EA 696
  • Cooperative Bank v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna & 5 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Kenya Ports Authority v Modern Holdings [E.A] Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Bank of Africa Kenya Limited & Another v TSS Investment Limited & 2 Others
    (Civil Appeal AE055 OF 2022) [2024] KECA 410 (KLR)
  • Kinuthia v Kanyi & Another
    (Environment & Land Case E007 OF 2023) [2024] KEELC 1625 (KLR)
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court, Nairobi
CMCC No. E431 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Muguika & 2 others v Consolidated Bank of Kenya Limited & another (Environment and Land Appeal E011 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 1484 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Nairobi CMCC No. E431 of 2023 (Appeal arising therefrom). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/1484/eng@2025-03-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.