Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2025] KEELC 1446 (KLR)

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission v Ogonji & another (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 39 of 2020) [2025] KEELC 1446 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 March 2025
3,881 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court cancelled a lease over railway land, confirming that even registered titles can be voided when land was allocated illegally.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission sued over the allocation of Kisumu Municipality/Block 7/559, which it averred was part of a railway reserve surveyed in 1935 and vested successively in the East African Railways and Harbours Administration (Legal Notice 440 of 1963), the East African Railways Corporation (Legal Notice 20 of 1969) and Kenya Railways Corporation (Legal Notice 24 of 1986). The Commission alleged that in 1999 the 1st Defendant unlawfully obtained a lease of the property from the 2nd Defendant, registered in June 2000 under the Registered Land Act, and sought declarations of nullity, rectification of the register in favour of Kenya Railways, a permanent injunction, general damages for fraud and costs. The 1st Defendant did not enter appearance; the 2nd Defendant entered appearance but filed no defence, so the suit proceeded undefended and unchallenged evidence was adduced through four witnesses, including survey maps, development plans and an EACC investigation report. The court framed four issues and found the suit property had been created from land reserved for Kenya Railways and was not unalienated government land available to the Commissioner of Lands under the repealed Government Lands Act, there being no evidence of surrender or de-gazettement. The allocation was therefore unlawful and unprocedural. Relying on the Land Registration Act 2012's exception for titles acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme, and on Macfoy v United Africa Co. and Wambui v Mwangi, the court held the lease and certificate of lease null and void. Judgment was entered for the Plaintiff on prayers (a) to (e), including rectification restoring the property to Kenya Railways Corporation and a permanent injunction. General damages for fraud were refused for want of evidence, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs since the suit was undefended. Judgment was delivered virtually at Kisumu on 20th March 2025 by S. Okong'o, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the allocation of the suit property to the 1st Defendant was lawful

Holding

The allocation was unlawful and unprocedural because the suit property was created from land reserved for and vested in Kenya Railways and was therefore not available for allocation by the Commissioner of Lands.

Reasoning

The evidence traced the land through vesting under Legal Notices 440 of 1963, 20 of 1969 and 24 of 1986. There was no evidence of de-gazettement or surrender to the Government before the 1998 allocation. Under section 3(a) of the Government Lands Act the Commissioner could only dispose of unalienated government land, which this land was not. The suit remained undefended and the evidence was unchallenged.

p. 5
02

Whether the lease and certificate of lease conferred any lawful interest on the 1st Defendant

Holding

The lease and certificate of lease were null and void and conferred no proprietary interest, since the title was acquired illegally and unprocedurally.

Reasoning

Although sections 27 and 28 of the Registered Land Act and sections 24, 25 and 26 of the Land Registration Act 2012 confer indefeasibility, section 26(1)(b) of the 2012 Act excepts titles acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme. Having found the allocation irregular, the court held the resulting title void, applying Macfoy and Wambui v Mwangi.

p. 7
03

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs sought

Holding

The Plaintiff proved its claim on a balance of probabilities and was granted declarations, rectification of the register and a permanent injunction, but not general damages for fraud.

Reasoning

The suit was undefended and the averments unrebutted. The court found the claim proved to the standard of a balance of probabilities. Prayers (a) to (e) were granted; prayer (f) failed for want of supporting evidence, and costs were not awarded against the undefended Defendants.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Land reserved for a public body and vested under a legal notice is not unalienated government land available for allocation by the Commissioner of Lands unless surrendered or the reservation is revoked.
  • A title acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme is a nullity and confers no proprietary interest.
  • An act which is a nullity need not be set aside by any order of court; it is automatically void, as held in Macfoy v United Africa Co Ltd.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the issuance of a lease by the 2nd Defendant to the 1st Defendant over Kisumu Municipality/Block 7/559 was null and void ab initio and ineffectual to confer any right, interest or title upon the 1st Defendant
  2. 2.A declaration that the registration of the lease and issuance of a certificate of lease over the suit property to the 1st Defendant was null and void and ineffectual to confer a good title
  3. 3.An order directing the Land Registrar Kisumu to rectify the register by cancelling the 1st Defendant's registration as leasehold proprietor and restoring the property in the name of Kenya Railways Corporation
  4. 4.An order of permanent injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from leasing, transferring, charging, entering upon, developing or in any manner dealing with the suit property
  5. 5.Each party shall bear its costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission ActNot specified (suit brought under the Act)
  • Government Lands Act, Chapter 280 Laws of Kenya (now repealed)Sections 2 and 3(a)
  • Registered Land Act, Chapter 300 Laws of Kenya (now repealed)Sections 27 and 28
  • Land Registration Act 2012Sections 24, 25 and 26
  • Legal Notice No. 440 of 1963Vesting of land in General Manager, East African Railways and Harbours Administration
  • Legal Notice No. 20 of 1969Vesting in East African Railways Corporation
  • Legal Notice No. 24 of 1986Vesting of assets in Kenya Railways Corporation

Cases cited (2)

  • Macfoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd.
    [1961] 3 All E.R 1169
  • Wambui v. Mwangi & 3 others
    (Civil Appeal 465 of 2019) [2021] KECA 144 (KLR)
Jurisdiction invoked
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Act, 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission v Ogonji & another (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 39 of 2020) [2025] KEELC 1446 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/1446/eng@2025-03-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.