Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedKisii ELC Petition (as filed on 4 November 2019)· [2025] KEELC 898 (KLR)

Sacapheso International Limited v National Land Commission & 4 others; Eversweet Bakery Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition 7 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 898 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 February 2025
1,132 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Land Court quashed a Gazette Notice that gave Kisii land to an estate whose title was never properly reviewed by the National Land Commission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The National Land Commission, through Gazette Notice No. 6862 of 17 July 2017, revoked the petitioner's title to Kisii Municipality/Block III/289 and vested it in the 5th respondent, administratrix of the estate of Simon Kegesa. The petitioner filed a constitutional petition on 4 November 2019 seeking declarations that the revocation was irregular and ultra vires the National Land Commission Act, the Fair Administrative Actions Act and the Land Registration Act, plus certiorari, prohibition, a permanent injunction against the 5th respondent, and costs. Eversweet Bakery Limited, holding a competing title and litigating with the petitioner in Kisii ELC No. 439 of 2013, was joined as interested party. The Attorney General opposed on behalf of the 2nd and 3rd respondents; the County Government disclaimed any role in revocation; the 5th respondent filed nothing. At the hearing on 19 November 2024 there was no appearance for the petitioner. The court noted it had, in a judgment delivered the same day in the sister suit, found the interested party to hold the better title and ordered cancellation of the petitioner's title, leaving the petitioner with no title to protect. However, since the Gazette Notice had vested title in the 5th respondent pursuant to a complaint directed only at the petitioner's title, and the interested party's title was never interrogated by the Commission, the court quashed the Gazette Notice by certiorari in respect of the suit parcel alone. All other prayers were refused. The court made no order as to costs and indicated the 5th respondent may sue the interested party if she claims good title.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of NLC revocation of title by Gazette Notice as against a party whose title was not under complaint

Holding

The Gazette Notice vesting title in the 5th respondent was quashed insofar as it affected the suit parcel, since the complaint concerned only the petitioner's title and the interested party's title was never interrogated.

Reasoning

The Gazette Notice vested titles in the 5th respondent over many parcels following a complaint about the petitioner's title. The court had already found in Kisii ELC No. 439 of 2015 that the interested party held the better title against the petitioner, so the petitioner had no title to protect. Since the NLC process never interrogated the interested party's title, allowing the Notice to vest the land in the 5th respondent would be unjust; the Notice was quashed as to the suit parcel, with liberty for the 5th respondent to sue the interested party.

p. 3
02

Whether the petitioner was entitled to the remaining constitutional and judicial review reliefs

Holding

The other prayers were refused because the petitioner's title had been cancelled in the sister suit.

Reasoning

The court noted it had delivered judgment the same day in Kisii ELC No. 439 of 2013/2015, finding the interested party to hold the better title and ordering cancellation of the petitioner's title. With no subsisting title, the petitioner had nothing to protect and could not benefit from prohibition, injunction or declarations beyond the quashing of the Gazette Notice.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A Gazette Notice vesting title in a person whose title was not the subject of the NLC complaint and was not interrogated cannot stand.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Certiorari quashing Gazette Notice No. 6862 of 17 July 2017 in respect of the land parcel Kisii Municipality/Block III/289 only
  2. 2.Dismissal of all other prayers in the petition
  3. 3.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • National Land Commission Act, 2012Section 14(2) & (7); Section 14
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015Section 7
  • Land Registration Act, No. 3 of 2012
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 67

Cases cited (2)

  • R vs The Chairman National Land Commission & Others ex parte Aboko John Samuel Kumenda & Another, Kisii ELC Judicial Review No. 3 of 2017
  • Republic vs National Land Commission & Others ex parte Dr. Anil Ratilal Tailor, Kisii ELC Judicial Review No. 9 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitutional petition (Article 67 of the Constitution and National Land Commission Act invoked); judicial review remedies sought in petition

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sacapheso International Limited v National Land Commission & 4 others; Eversweet Bakery Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition 7 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 898 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Kisii ELC Petition (as filed on 4 November 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/898/eng@2025-02-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.