Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (Kericho ELC suit; relates to Kericho CMELC No. E021 of 2020)· [2025] KEELC 865 (KLR)

Chepkorir (Suing as legal representative of the Estate of Paul Rotich Ngeny) v Yegon & another (Environment & Land Case E018 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 865 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 February 2025
2,267 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Kericho struck out a defendant's attempt to have a land case dismissed, ruling the argument relied on facts needing evidence.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kericho (L. A. Omollo, J) determined a preliminary objection dated 7th May 2024 raised by the 2nd Defendant in a suit in which the Plaintiff, claiming to be beneficial owner of land parcel Kericho/Chemoiben/967, sought a declaration of lawful proprietorship of the estate of Paul Rotich Ng'enyi, eviction, vacant possession, a permanent injunction, mesne profits, and general, punitive and exemplary damages for trespass against the Defendants. The 2nd Defendant objected on three grounds: non-compliance with Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act ousting jurisdiction; want of jurisdiction and failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action; and res judicata arising from Kericho CMELC No. E021 of 2020, besides abuse of process. The court framed a single issue: whether the preliminary objection was merited. Applying Oraro v Mbaja, it held that a preliminary objection must be a pure point of law not blurred with contested facts. On the Section 18(2) ground, the court noted its own prior order of 9th November 2023 referring the matter to the Land Registrar Kericho to determine the position on the ground, whose report has not been filed; only a County Surveyor's report exists, identifying discrepancies between map and ground positions. The objection was premature, jurisdiction to be determined after the Registrar's report. On res judicata, following George Kamau Kimani, the court held that res judicata requires analysis of pleadings and cannot be raised by preliminary objection. The preliminary objection was struck out with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is fatally defective for non-compliance with Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act

Holding

The objection was premature; the matter had already been referred to the Land Registrar and jurisdiction can only be determined after the Registrar files a report

Reasoning

Section 18(2) bars courts from entertaining boundary disputes unless boundaries have been determined under that section. On 9th November 2023 the court referred the matter to the Land Registrar Kericho to determine the position on the ground and file a report, upon which jurisdiction would be determined. Only a County Surveyor's report exists on record; the Land Registrar has not filed a report. Until then it cannot be said with certainty that the dispute is a boundary dispute; the Plaintiff maintains it is one of encroachment. The objection was therefore premature.

p. 5
02

Whether the suit is res judicata given Kericho CMELC No. E021 of 2020

Holding

Res judicata cannot be determined on a preliminary objection as it requires analysis of pleadings by way of affidavit evidence

Reasoning

Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act requires that the matter in the former suit was heard and finally decided. The 2nd Defendant contends the issues were adjudicated in Kericho CMELC No. E021 of 2020. Relying on George Kamau Kimani, the court held that res judicata is best raised by notice of motion with pleadings annexed, not by preliminary objection. The Defendant also did not annex the pleadings and decision of the lower court. The ground therefore failed.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law and cannot depend on facts to be ascertained or proved by evidence.
  • Res judicata cannot be raised by way of preliminary objection because it requires analysis of pleadings presented by way of affidavit evidence.
  • Where a dispute is referred to the Land Registrar under Section 18 of the Land Registration Act, the question of the court's jurisdiction should await the Registrar's report.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 2nd Defendant's preliminary objection dated 7th May, 2024 is struck out with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 18(2)
  • Land Registration ActSections 15, 18(1)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7

Cases cited (9)

  • Okoiti v Parliament of Kenya & 2 Others; County Government of Taita Taveta & 3 Others (Interested Parties) (Petition 33 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 33 (KLR)
    [2022] KEELC 33 (KLR) (23 March 2022) (Ruling)
  • Republic v Chief Magistrate Nairobi Ex parte Gatheru Gathemia
    [2007] eKLR
  • Fredrick Nganga Thuo v Peter Mungai Njuho
    [2017] eKLR
  • Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission vs Maina Kiai & 5 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Njue Ngai v Ephantus Njiru Ngai & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Moses Mbatia v Joseph Wambura Kihara
    [2021] eKLR
  • Diwafa Investments Ltd v Joakim Musyoki Kiio
    [2019] eKLR
  • Oraro vs Mbaja
    2005 1 KLR 141
  • George Kamau Kimani & 4 others v County Government of Trans-Nzoia & another
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chepkorir (Suing as legal representative of the Estate of Paul Rotich Ngeny) v Yegon & another (Environment & Land Case E018 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 865 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment (Kericho ELC suit; relates to Kericho CMELC No. E021 of 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/865/eng@2025-02-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.