Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedPetition (ELC, Malindi) – Notice of Motion dated 2/9/2024· [2025] KEELC 788 (KLR)

Agnes Nthenya Kilonzo t/a Kokomo Beach Bar and Restaurant & another v County Executive Committee Member for Lands, Physical Planning, Housing and Urbanization & another; Lion Beach Resort (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition E13 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 788 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 February 2025
3,887 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Malindi court temporarily stopped Kilifi County from demolishing a Watamu beach business, holding that businesses licensed by public authorities deserve a full hearing before removal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Malindi (Mwangi Njoroge J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 2/9/2024 in which the Petitioners, owners of Kokomo Beach Bar & Restaurant on riparian reserve land at Watamu Marine Protected Area, sought conservatory orders restraining the County Government of Kilifi from demolishing their premises or enforcing a demolition order issued on 9 October 2023, pending hearing of their Petition. The Petitioners asserted that KWS and Watamu Youth Development Group authorised their structures, that the County issued them a single business permit in January 2023, and that the enforcement notice of 21 September 2023 was never served, breaching Article 47. The Respondents opposed, contending the structures were erected on riparian reserve without county planning approval or National Land Commission authority contrary to Article 62(2). Lion Beach Resort Limited, the Interested Party, opposed on res judicata grounds, relying on ELC Misc. Application No. 1 of 2024 in which leave to enforce the demolition order had been obtained. The court first held the application was not res judicata since the parties in the miscellaneous application differed. On conservatory orders, guided by Gatirau Peter Munya, the court declined to make a definitive prima facie case finding, holding that serious issues of public law, environmental governance, condonation and estoppel arise from the County's licensing conduct and KWS authorisation, which require a full hearing. The court allowed the motion in terms of Prayers 3 and 5, made costs of the motion costs in the cause, and directed expedition of the petition with responses within 14 days and a directions mention on 11 March 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the application is res judicata the Petitioners' application in ELC Misc. Application No. 1 of 2024

Holding

The application is not res judicata because the parties in the former miscellaneous application were different.

Reasoning

Applying Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the conjunctive elements set out in Kenya Commercial Bank v Benjoh Amalgamated Limited, the court noted that in ELC Misc. Application No. E001 of 2024 (Ignace Mchana Nyambu v Abudi Shoshi Abudi & Agnes Kilonzo) the dispute was between different parties from the present petition. Since identity of parties and title is a mandatory element of res judicata, the Interested Party's contention could not stand on that basis alone.

p. 6
02

Whether the Petitioners established a case for conservatory orders pending the hearing of the Petition

Holding

Conservatory orders were granted in terms of Prayers 3 and 5 because serious issues of public law and governance arise, without a definitive finding on prima facie case.

Reasoning

Relying on Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji, the court held that conservatory orders bear a public law connotation. Although the Petitioners admitted constructing structures on riparian reserve land without county development permission, the County Government had issued them a single business permit after charging various fees, and KWS had permitted a temporary banda. Questions of condonation, estoppel and rights of persons investing with regulatory authority could not be resolved at the interlocutory stage.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • The elements of res judicata are conjunctive and all must be present, including identity of parties litigating under the same title
  • Conservatory orders are granted on the inherent merit of the case bearing in mind public interest and constitutional values, unlike interlocutory injunctions
  • Where serious issues of public law and national values and principles of governance arise, a court may grant conservatory orders without making a definitive finding on prima facie case

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A conservatory order restraining the Respondents, their agents, employees or servants from demolishing the Petitioners' business premises known as Kokomo Beach Bar & Restaurant at Watamu Marine Protected Area pending hearing and determination of the Petition (Prayer 3)
  2. 2.A conservatory order restraining the Respondents from implementing and/or enforcing the demolition order issued vide letter dated 9th October 2023 pending hearing and determination of the Petition (Prayer 5)
  3. 3.Costs of the motion in the cause
  4. 4.The hearing of the petition to be expedited; Respondents to file and serve responses within 14 days; parties to appear for directions on 11/3/2025

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 25(c), 40, 47, 50, 62(2), 22(1), 258(1)
  • Physical and Land Use ActSections 57(2), 72
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7

Cases cited (10)

  • Bandid & another v Ministry of East African Community (EAC), the ASALS and Regional Development & 3 others (Petition E002 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 3479 (KLR)
    [2024] KEHC 3479 (KLR)
  • Mrao Limited v First American Bank of Kenya Ltd & 2 others [2003] KLR 125
    [2003] KLR 125
  • Giella v Cassman Brown
  • Hassan Huri & another v Japhet Mwakala [2015] eKLR
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kennedy Mokua Ongiri v John Nyasende Mosioma & another [2022] eKLR
    [2022] eKLR
  • Kenya Commercial Bank –v- Benjoh Amalgamated Limited (2017) eKLR
    (2017) eKLR
  • Martin Nyaga Wambora -v- Speaker of the County Assembly of Embu & 3 Others Petition No. 7 Of 2014
    Petition No. 7 of 2014
  • Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji & 2 others [2014] eKLR
    [2014] eKLR
  • Wilson Kaberia Nkunja -v- The Magistrate and Judges Vetting Board and Other [2016] eKLR
    [2016] eKLR
  • Damour Florian Emmeric v Director of Immigration Services [2022] eKLR
    [2022] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 22(1), 23 and 258(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (enforcement of Bill of Rights before the Environment and Land Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Agnes Nthenya Kilonzo t/a Kokomo Beach Bar and Restaurant & another v County Executive Committee Member for Lands, Physical Planning, Housing and Urbanization & another; Lion Beach Resort (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition E13 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 788 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Petition (ELC, Malindi) – Notice of Motion dated 2/9/2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/788/eng@2025-02-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.