Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC Appeal (Kerugoya) against Ruling in Kerugoya CM ELC No. E17 of 2022· [2025] KEELC 716 (KLR)

Ngondi & another v Ngondi (Environment and Land Appeal E031 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 716 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 February 2025
2,760 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court reinstated co-wives' land trust claim, ruling an old tribunal decision was void and trust claims never expire.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellants, co-wives of the late Ngondi Gachoki, appealed against a ruling of Hon. Cheruto C. Kipkorir (PM) in Kerugoya CM ELC No. E17 of 2022, in which the learned magistrate upheld a preliminary objection and struck out their suit claiming a declaration of trust over land parcels Mutithi/Strip/468 and 469. The preliminary objection was grounded on res judicata, relying on a Land Disputes Tribunal award endorsed by the Wang'uru court in 2002 but never implemented, and on limitation under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act. On appeal, Mutungi, J of the Environment and Land Court, Kerugoya, re-evaluated the material before the trial magistrate in keeping with Selle v East African Motor Boat. He held that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted without jurisdiction under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act, 1990, since it determined issues of ownership rather than boundaries, occupation or trespass; its award was therefore ultra vires, null and void ab initio, and incapable of sustaining a plea of res judicata, applying Vincent Kipsongok Rotich v Orphah Jelagat Ngelechei and Macfoy v United Africa Co Ltd. He further held that claims founded on trust are not time bound, so the suit was not statute barred, and that customary trust under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act, 2012 is an overriding interest, with the burden of proof resting on the appellants at trial. Allowing the appeal, the court set aside the ruling, reinstated the suit for hearing before any other magistrate other than Hon. Cheruto C. Kipkorir, and ordered each party to bear their own costs of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata and jurisdiction of the Land Disputes Tribunal

Holding

The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act to decide issues of ownership/trust; its award was null and void ab initio and could not sustain a plea of res judicata

Reasoning

The Tribunal's mandate was confined to boundary disputes, claims to occupy or work land, and trespass. It went outside its mandate by deciding ownership, so it was not a 'competent Court' within Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act. Moreover its award was never implemented, so there was in effect no decision capable of supporting res judicata.

p. 4
02

Limitation of actions and trust claims

Holding

A claim founded on trust is not time-barred under the Limitation of Actions Act

Reasoning

The suit was based on customary trust; such claims are not time bound. Customary trust under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act, 2012 is an overriding interest not requiring notation on the register, and the Appellants bear the burden of proving the trust at trial.

p. 5
03

Preliminary objection threshold

Holding

The preliminary objection constituted pure points of law and met the Mukisa Biscuits threshold, but succeeded only in part because the underlying grounds failed

Reasoning

Although the objection was on pure points of law and thus properly framed, the court found on re-evaluation that both grounds (res judicata and limitation) failed, requiring the impugned ruling to be set aside.

Legal principles established

#
  • A decision of a tribunal acting without jurisdiction is null and void ab initio and cannot found a plea of res judicata
  • Claims predicated on trust are not subject to the limitation of actions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Ruling by the Learned Principal Magistrate delivered on 3rd May 2023 is set aside
  2. 2.The suit is reinstated and ordered to be heard before any other Magistrate with jurisdiction other than Hon. Cheruto C. Kipkorir
  3. 3.Each party shall bear their own costs of the Appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions ActCap 22, Section 7
  • Land Disputes Tribunal ActSection 3(1)
  • Civil Procedure ActCap 21, Section 7
  • Land Registration Act2012, Section 28

Cases cited (10)

  • Mukisa Biscuits –vs- Westend Distributors Ltd
    (1969) EA 696
  • Stephen Ntokoiwuan Koikai –vs- Raphael Lekisho Koikai
    (2007) eKLR; Nakuru HCCC No. 111 of 2007
  • Damaris Kondoro –vs- Gachanja Gitere & Another
    (2005) eKLR
  • Njangu –vs- Wambugu & Another
    Nairobi HCCC No. 234 of 1991
  • Judith Gathoni Willy –vs- George Kihara Michuki & 2 Others
    (2010) eKLR
  • Pangea Holdings LLC & Another –vs- Hacienda Development Ltd & 2 Others
    (2020) eKLR
  • Selle & Another –vs- East African Motor Boat & Others
    (1968) EA 123
  • Vincent Kipsongok Rotich –vs- Orphah Jelagat Ngelechei
    (2014) eKLR
  • Phoenix of E. A Assurance Ltd –vs- S. M. Thiga T/a Newspaper Service
    (2019) eKLR
  • Macfoy –vs- United Africa Co. Ltd
    (1961) 3 All ER 1169
On appeal from
Principal Magistrate's Court, Kerugoya (ELC)
Kerugoya CM ELC No. E17 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over appeals from subordinate courts (first appeal on facts and law)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngondi & another v Ngondi (Environment and Land Appeal E031 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 716 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Appeal (Kerugoya) against Ruling in Kerugoya CM ELC No. E17 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/716/eng@2025-02-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.