Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedBusia Environment and Land Court Appeal (from Busia CMCC No. 432 of 2014)· [2025] KEELC 684 (KLR)

Gogni Rajope Construction Company v Dennis (Environment and Land Appeal E002 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 684 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 February 2025
4,311 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed landlords must give statutory notice even for unwritten tenancies, but cut a tenant's payout by removing duplicated damages and unproven repair costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal from the judgment of Hon. Lucy Ambasi, Chief Magistrate, in Busia CMCC No. 432 of 2014, where the respondent (plaintiff) successfully sued the appellant company (defendant) for rent arrears, mesne profits, damages and repair costs on land parcel Bunyala/Bulemia/3638. The trial court awarded mesne profits of Kshs.672,000, repair charges of Kshs.230,000, general damages of Kshs.500,000, costs and interest. The appellant lodged a sixteen-ground appeal, contending inter alia that the magistrate erred in importing a requirement of written notice to terminate an unwritten tenancy, that the tenancy ended by forfeiture in 2013, and that the awards were excessive and doubled compensation. The court, guided by Section 78 of the Civil Procedure Act and the usual first-appeal principles, upheld the magistrate's finding that the controlled tenancy required statutory notice under Section 4(2) of Cap 301 and continued until handover on 30 November 2018. However, the court held it improper to award both mesne profits and general damages, and that mesne profits were unquantified in the plaint; the mesne profits award was set aside. The repair charges of Kshs.230,000 failed as unpleaded special damages. The general damages award of Kshs.500,000 was left undisturbed, and the mitigation argument failed since the appellant retained part of the premises until 2018. The appeal partly succeeded: the lower court judgment was set aside and substituted with general damages of Kshs.500,000, costs and interest, with the appellant having half costs here and below.

Key legal issues

#
01

Requirement of notice to terminate a controlled tenancy

Holding

The trial magistrate did not err; the notice requirement is statutory, not a contractual term imported suo moto

Reasoning

The tenancy was unwritten and thus a controlled tenancy under Section 2 of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act. Section 4(2) obliges a landlord to give notice in the prescribed form to terminate. The respondent testified the tenancy continued to 30 November 2018, and the appellant's own manager admitted rent arrears and liability for repairs. No director testified to rebut this evidence.

p. 4
02

Double award of mesne profits and general damages

Holding

It was improper to award both mesne profits (Kshs.672,000) and general damages (Kshs.500,000); the mesne profits award was set aside

Reasoning

Following Kenya Hotels Properties Ltd v Willesden Investments Ltd and Maina Kabuchwa v Gachuma Gacheru, mesne profits and damages for trespass mean the same thing and only one can be granted. Additionally, no specific sum was pleaded as mesne profits in the plaint, so the quantified award of Kshs.672,000 was unjustified.

p. 6
03

Repair charges of Kshs.230,000 as special damages

Holding

The award was set aside because repair charges were not specifically pleaded as a quantified sum

Reasoning

The plaint claimed damages generally for damage to the house without quantifying repair charges. Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved. Producing receipts at trial did not cure the failure to plead the specific sum; the plaint ought to have been amended.

p. 7
04

Mitigation of losses

Holding

The respondent was not at fault for failing to mitigate; the appellant still retained part of the premises

Reasoning

The duty to mitigate is one of fact and does not require the injured party to injure himself or his property. Since the appellant only handed over on 30 November 2018, repossessing and re-letting would have been imprudent; awaiting handover was reasonable.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • A landlord of a controlled tenancy must give statutory notice in the prescribed form to terminate it, even where the tenancy is unwritten
  • Mesne profits and damages for trespass/general damages for wrongful occupation cannot both be awarded for the same period
  • Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal partly succeeds
  2. 2.The judgment in the lower Court is set aside and substituted with an award of general damages of Kshs.500,000, costs and interest
  3. 3.The appellant, having succeeded only partly, to have half costs here and in the Court below

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 78
  • Landlord And Tenant (Shops, Hotels And Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301Sections 2(a), 2(c), 4(2)

Cases cited (11)

  • Selle & Another -v- Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd
    1968 EA 123
  • Mkube -v- Nyamuro
    1983 KLR 403
  • Peter M. Kariuki -v- A.G
    2014 eKLR
  • Peters -v- Sunday Post Ltd
    1968 EA 424
  • National Bank Of Kenya -v- Pipe Plastic Sankolit (v) Ltd
    2002 E.A 502 [2011]
  • Kenya Hotels Properties Ltd -v- Willesden Investments Ltd
    Civil Appeal No. 149 of 2007 [2009 eKLR]
  • Maina Kabuchwa -v- Gachuma Gacheru
    2018 eKLR
  • Peter Mwangi Msuitia & Another -v- Samson Edin Osman
    2014 eKLR
  • Hahn -v- Singh
    Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1983 [1985 KLR 716]
  • Coast Bus Service -v- Murunga & Others
    Civil Appeal No. 192 of 1992
  • African Highland Produce Ltd -v- Kisorio
    2001 1 E.A 1
On appeal from
Busia Chief Magistrate's Court
Busia CMCC No. 432 of 2014
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction under Section 78 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gogni Rajope Construction Company v Dennis (Environment and Land Appeal E002 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 684 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Busia Environment and Land Court Appeal (from Busia CMCC No. 432 of 2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/684/eng@2025-02-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.