Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (ELC, Malindi)· [2025] KEELC 257 (KLR)

Africa Muslims Agency Trust Registered Trustees v Nzili Headmaster Ama Primary School, Kilifi & 4 others (Environment & Land Case E092 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 257 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 January 2025
2,558 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Malindi dismissed a defendant's attempt to throw out a land dispute on a technicality, ruling the incorporated trust could sue.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 5th Defendant filed a preliminary objection dated 20/9/2024 in a land dispute before the Environment and Land Court at Malindi, contending that the court lacked jurisdiction; that the suit was time-barred under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, having been filed over 20 years after title registration; that the suit contravened Section 3(3) of the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act; and that the verifying and supporting affidavits were fatally defective for having been sworn by a stranger in the law of trusts who described himself as a director. The plaintiff, Africa Muslims Agency Trust Registered Trustees, responded that the dispute over land ownership fell within the court's jurisdiction under Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act; that the cause of action accrued in August 2024 when the defendant began preparing to construct classrooms; and that, as an incorporated trust with a certificate of incorporation, it had capacity to sue in its corporate name, with the description of the deponent being a curable typographical error. Framing four issues, the court applied the Mukisa Biscuits definition of a preliminary objection. It held the jurisdiction ground had been abandoned for want of submissions and was in any event unfounded; the limitation ground failed because the date of accrual was a disputed fact requiring ascertainment; and the locus standi ground failed because the plaintiff was an incorporated trust with power to sue under Section 3(3), distinguishing Africa Christian Church v Macharia which concerned an unincorporated trust. The preliminary objection was dismissed in its entirety, with directions for filing of trial bundles and a mention on 24/3/2025. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC

Holding

The court has jurisdiction over land ownership disputes; the jurisdiction ground was abandoned and fails in any event.

Reasoning

The dispute over land ownership and a declaration of ownership falls squarely within Section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act. The Defendants raised the jurisdiction ground but filed no submissions on it, so it was treated as abandoned; on perusal of the plaint the claim falls within the court's jurisdiction.

p. 4
02

Limitation

Holding

The limitation ground fails because the date of accrual of the cause of action is disputed and requires ascertainment of fact.

Reasoning

A preliminary objection cannot be sustained where facts are disputed. The plaintiff contended the cause of action arose in August 2024 when the defendant began preparing to construct classrooms, while the defendant relied on the date of title registration 26 years earlier. Since accrual is disputed, the ground does not meet the Mukisa Biscuits threshold.

p. 4
03

Locus standi and capacity of the plaintiff

Holding

The plaintiff, an incorporated registered trust, has locus standi; the objection fails.

Reasoning

Section 3(3) of the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act gives an incorporated trust power to sue and be sued in its corporate name. Unlike in the Africa Christian Church case, the plaintiff here is incorporated, evidenced by a certificate of incorporation. That the deponent described himself as a 'director' is a curable defect, as he also describes himself as a trustee in the verifying affidavit.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection raises a pure point of law argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded are correct, and cannot be raised where any fact has to be ascertained
  • Once trustees are issued a certificate of incorporation they become a body corporate with power to sue and be sued in their corporate name

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection dated 20/9/2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.The parties shall file their respective trial bundles, the plaintiff within 21 days and the defendants within 42 days from the date of the ruling, timelines running concurrently
  3. 3.The suit to be listed for mention on 24/3/2025 for issuance of a hearing date
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Africa Muslims Agency Trust Registered Trustees v Nzili Headmaster Ama Primary School, Kilifi & 4 others (Environment & Land Case E092 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 257 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment (ELC, Malindi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/257/eng@2025-01-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.