Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (Environment and Land Court at Mombasa)· [2025] KEELC 143 (KLR)

Kombo v Abdalla & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 117 of 2017) [2025] KEELC 143 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 January 2025
2,139 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

When a Kenyan plaintiff dies and no one joins their legal representative within one year, the entire lawsuit legally dies with them — injunctions included.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (L. L. Naikuni, J) determines a Notice of Motion dated 5th July 2024 filed by the 3rd Defendant under Order 24 Rules 3(2) and 7(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, seeking a declaration that the suit had abated and costs. The applicant, a sibling of the deceased plaintiff, deponed that the sole plaintiff died on 20th December 2017 leaving no widow or child; that one year lapsed on 19th December 2018 without any substitution or probate process; and that although the plaintiff's advocates obtained leave in November 2021 to apply for letters of administration ad litem, the suit had long abated. None of the respondents filed replies. The court framed two issues: whether the application was merited and who should bear its costs. Applying Order 24 Rule 3 and the Court of Appeal's decision in Rebecca Mijide Mungole v Kenya Power & Lighting Co Ltd, the court held that the cause of action survived the plaintiff, that no application to join the legal representative was made within one year, and that the suit therefore abated and is dismissed. The court vacated all orders, including interim orders of injunction. On costs, although costs normally follow the event under Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the court declined to award costs. The application was allowed with no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit abated upon the death of the sole Plaintiff

Holding

The suit abated because the deceased Plaintiff's legal representatives were never joined within one year of death; the suit is marked as abated and dismissed, and interim orders are vacated

Reasoning

Order 24 Rule 3(2) provides that where no application is made within one year of a plaintiff's death to join the legal representative, the suit abates. The plaintiff died on 20th December 2017 and no substitution occurred; the only step taken was leave in November 2021 to apply for letters of administration ad litem, long after abatement. Citing Rebecca Mijide Mungole, the court reiterated that time must first be extended before joinder and revival applications can be made. Since no such steps were taken, the suit abated as a matter of law by operation of time.

p. 4
02

Who bears the costs of the application

Holding

No orders as to costs, the court exercising its discretion under Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Reasoning

Costs follow the event under Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the successful party is ordinarily entitled to costs. However, the court exercised its discretion and declined to award costs, reserving its discretion in not awarding costs, so each party bears its own.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit abates automatically where a sole plaintiff dies and no application to join the legal representative is made within one year; the effect of abatement is that the suit ceases to exist in the eye of the law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That the Notice of Motion application dated 5th July, 2024 be and is hereby allowed as pleaded
  2. 2.That the suit be and is hereby marked as abated
  3. 3.That all orders herein including the interim orders of injunction are hereby vacated
  4. 4.That there shall be no orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 24 Rule 3
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 24 Rule 7
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 51 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21Section 27(1)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010General reference

Cases cited (4)

  • Rebecca Mijide Mungole & Another – Versus - Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Jasbir Rai Singh – Versus - Tarchalan Singh
    eKLR (2014)
  • Cecilia Karuru Ngayo – Versus – Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
    eKLR (2014)
  • Hussein Muhumed Sirat – Versus - Attorney General & Another
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 24 Rules 3(2) and 7(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kombo v Abdalla & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 117 of 2017) [2025] KEELC 143 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment (Environment and Land Court at Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/143/eng@2025-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.