Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated (Applications dated 30th July 2024 and 2nd August 2024)· [2025] KEELC 30 (KLR)

Equip Agencies Limited & another v Gitau Ngigi Mureithi Njoroge (Sued as office bearers of Gilgil Total Investors Self Help Group) & 4 others (Environment & Land Case 89 of 2024) (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 30 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 January 2025
4,117 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Once a Kenyan court finalises its decision, it cannot issue new orders—you must seek protection from the Court of Appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a Ruling dated 18th July 2024, the Environment and Land Court at Naivasha had dismissed the Plaintiffs' application dated 2nd August 2023, struck out their entire suit with costs as res judicata, and set aside interim injunctions earlier granted over L.R No. Gilgil Township Block 2/210. Aggrieved, the Plaintiffs lodged a notice of appeal and an application before the Court of Appeal, and then filed two fresh applications in this court: the 2nd Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2024 and the 1st Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 2nd August 2024, each seeking temporary injunctions restraining the Defendants from evicting, selling, subdividing or otherwise interfering with the suit property pending the intended appeal and a Rule 5(2)(b) application at the Court of Appeal. The Plaintiffs argued under Erinford Properties principles that the court had jurisdiction to preserve the substratum of the appeal, that the appeal was arguable, that the Defendants' eviction contravened Sections 152E and 152G of the Land Act, and that damages would be inadequate. The 1st, 3rd and 5th Defendants opposed, contending that the court was functus officio, that no suit existed to anchor the injunctions, that the applications were res judicata, that the equity of redemption had been extinguished by the auction sale of 24th January 2019, and that any fault in the auction was compensable in damages. The court adopted the doctrine of functus officio as defined in Black's Law Dictionary and as articulated in Jersey Evening Post Limited v Al Thani, holding that its judgment having been perfected, prior injunction applications having been rejected, the suit having been declared res judicata, and the Plaintiffs having elected to appeal, it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the fresh applications. Both applications were dismissed with costs on 16th January 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Functus officio and jurisdiction

Holding

Having perfected its judgment of 18th July 2024, declared the suit res judicata, and been informed that the Plaintiffs had elected to appeal, the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain fresh injunction applications pending appeal.

Reasoning

The court adopted the Black's Law Dictionary definition of functus officio and the Supreme Court-endorsed formulation in Jersey Evening Post Limited v Al Thani, that a court is functus once it has performed all its duties and its judgment has been perfected. The matter had been concluded in Nairobi High Court Comm Case No. 87 of 2019, the suit was struck out as res judicata, and the Plaintiffs had chosen the appellate route, leaving no jurisdiction in this court.

p. 8
02

Injunction pending appeal after striking out suit

Holding

No injunction pending appeal can issue where there is no subsisting suit to anchor it and where the court is functus officio.

Reasoning

The 1st Defendant argued, and the court effectively accepted, that the suit having been struck out on 18th July 2024 there was no suit in existence in which an application for injunction could be anchored. The applications also mirrored the application dated 2nd August 2023 already dismissed as res judicata, so granting them would amount to the court sitting on appeal over its own ruling.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A court becomes functus officio once its judgment or order has been perfected; any challenge must be taken to a higher court.
  • A party who elects to appeal against a ruling cannot thereafter invoke the same court's jurisdiction for interim relief anchored on that ruling.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applications dated 30th July 2024 and 2nd August 2024 are dismissed with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Civil Procedure Act (Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 63(e), 75(1), 95) and Civil Procedure Rules 2010 (Orders 42, 50, 51)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Equip Agencies Limited & another v Gitau Ngigi Mureithi Njoroge (Sued as office bearers of Gilgil Total Investors Self Help Group) & 4 others (Environment & Land Case 89 of 2024)  (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 30 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated (Applications dated 30th July 2024 and 2nd August 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/30/eng@2025-01-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.