Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNotice of Motion dated 6th May 2024 arising from the appeal (judgment delivered 25th April 2024)· [2025] KEELC 10 (KLR)

Shilaro v Shilaro & another (Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 10 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 January 2025
1,000 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court paused an eviction because forcing the occupants off the land before their appeal is heard would cause them serious harm.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by D. O. Ohungo, J of the Environment and Land Court on the Respondents/Applicants' Notice of Motion dated 6th May 2024 seeking stay of execution of the court's judgment of 25th April 2024 and its decree, pending an appeal to the Court of Appeal. In the underlying judgment, the court had allowed the Appellant's appeal, dismissed the Respondents' counterclaim, ordered them to vacate land parcel N/Kabras/Surungai/1148 within 90 days (failing which the Subordinate Court would issue an eviction order), and directed removal of a caution registered in favour of Peter Juma Shilaro. The Applicants, who filed a Notice of Appeal on 3rd May 2024 and later Civil Appeal No. E118 of 2024 at the Court of Appeal at Kisumu, argued they would suffer substantial and irreparable loss if evicted. The Appellant countered that Samuel Shindani Shilaro had no house on the property and only ploughed it. The court applied Order 42 rule 6(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and the authorities on substantial loss, holding that an eviction would amount to substantial loss and that the application was filed timeously. The court granted a stay of execution pending the appeal, but limited its duration to two years to encourage the Applicants to proactively prosecute the appeal, and made no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of execution pending appeal should issue

Holding

Stay granted; eviction from the suit property would amount to substantial loss, the application was filed timeously, and an appeal (Civil Appeal No. E118 of 2024, Court of Appeal, Kisumu) is in existence

Reasoning

The court applied Order 42 rule 6(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The Applicants filed a Notice of Appeal on 3rd May 2024 and later filed Civil Appeal No. E118 of 2024 at the Court of Appeal at Kisumu, satisfying rule 6(4). The judgment required them to vacate the suit property within 90 days failing which an eviction order would issue; the court found eviction would amount to substantial loss. The application was filed timeously, and the court limited the stay's duration to encourage diligent prosecution of the appeal.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Substantial loss is the cornerstone of the jurisdiction to grant stay of execution pending appeal; an application cannot succeed without demonstration of substantial loss
  • An applicant for stay must demonstrate substantial loss, absence of unreasonable delay, and furnish security as ordered

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the judgment and decree herein granted pending hearing and determination of the Respondents/Applicants' appeal to the Court of Appeal
  2. 2.The stay orders shall remain in force for a period of only 2 (two) years from the date of delivery of the ruling, unless otherwise extended in the Appellate Court
  3. 3.No order as to costs of the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 42 rule 6(1), (2) and (4)

Cases cited (2)

  • Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd v Kigaita Ngare Unduthu & 36 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Kenya Shell Limited v Benjamin Karuga Kibiru & another
    [1986] eKLR
On appeal from
Subordinate Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 rule 6(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (stay of execution pending appeal to the Court of Appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Shilaro v Shilaro & another (Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 10 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 6th May 2024 arising from the appeal (judgment delivered 25th April 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/10/eng@2025-01-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.