Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedMachakos ELC Misc Application (two applications dated 3rd July 2023 and 7th July 2023)· [2024] KEELC 7415 (KLR)

Nzei & Company Advocates v Export Processing Zones Authority (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E017 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 7415 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 November 2024
2,206 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court let KAA challenge a Kshs. 35.5 million taxed legal bill late, and blocked judgment on that bill until the challenge is decided.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (Nyukuri J) determined two applications arising from a taxation ruling delivered on 29th May 2023 by Hon. Anne Nyoike in Machakos ELC Misc Application No. 17 of 2022, taxing the advocate's bill of costs at Kshs. 35,505,007/-. The client, a public body, sought leave to file a reference out of time, explaining that the ruling's delivery date changed from 25th to 29th May 2023 without notice to its counsel, and that the ruling was only furnished on 30th June 2023, whereupon it immediately filed a notice of objection. The advocate opposed, alleging inordinate delay and indolence. The advocate also moved under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act for judgment against the client for the taxed and certified sum plus interest. The court framed two issues and applied the Supreme Court's Salat criteria on extension of time, holding that the one-month delay was not inordinate since the client needed the ruling before deciding to challenge it, and that a triable issue existed given the taxation of a similar bill at about Kshs. 27 million, suggesting an error in principle. Leave to file the reference out of time was granted, with 14 days to file and serve. The court declined to enter judgment on the certificate of costs while it remained under challenge, staying the advocate's application pending the reference. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file reference against a taxation ruling

Holding

The client's one-month delay was not inordinate given the delay in furnishing the ruling, and a triable issue on the taxation was raised; leave was granted

Reasoning

The court applied the Salat criteria. The delay of one month since delivery of the ruling was explained by the need to obtain a copy of the ruling, which was only furnished on 30th June 2023, and the fact that the delay in furnishing the ruling was not disputed. The client also demonstrated a triable issue by pointing to the taxation of a similar bill at about Kshs. 27 million, suggesting an error in principle.

p. 4
02

Entry of judgment on a certificate of costs still under challenge

Holding

Judgment cannot be entered while the certificate is subject to an intended reference; the advocate's application is held in abeyance

Reasoning

Section 51(2) empowers the court to enter judgment on a certificate of costs, but that certificate must not be set aside or altered by the court. Since the client was granted leave to file a reference challenging the taxation, the certificate remained contested and judgment was premature. The advocate's application, filed after the extension application, was stayed pending the reference.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Extension of time is a discretionary equitable remedy, not a right; the applicant must explain the delay to the court's satisfaction
  • Under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, a certificate of costs is final unless set aside or altered by the Court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The client is granted leave to file reference out of prescribed time in objection to the taxing officer's ruling delivered on 29th May 2023
  2. 2.The client shall file and serve reference challenging the taxing officer's ruling delivered on 29th May 2023 within 14 days of this ruling
  3. 3.The hearing of the application dated 7th July 2023 is stayed, pending hearing and determination of the intended reference by the client
  4. 4.Each party shall bear its own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Paragraph 11(4) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order and Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nzei & Company Advocates v Export Processing Zones Authority (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E017 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 7415 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Machakos ELC Misc Application (two applications dated 3rd July 2023 and 7th July 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7415/eng@2024-11-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.