Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedChamber Summons dated 21/6/2022· [2024] KEELC 7291 (KLR)

Pere v Gicheru & another (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E071 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 7291 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
4 November 2024
769 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling determines a Chamber Summons dated 21/6/2022 brought by the applicant advocate under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2014, Sections 3A and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant sought setting aside of the decision of the Deputy Registrar delivered on 13/6/2022, which awarded him Kshs. 221,271.28 as taxed costs out of a claim of Kshs. 500,524.95. He alleged errors in principle: a 65% reduction of instruction fees, reduction of getting up fees, under-awards on particular items, folios, attendances and court fees. The respondent opposed, contending the suit was undefended so fees were correctly assessed and that the taxing officer has discretion to disallow items. The court framed two issues: whether the applicant exhausted the paragraph 11 procedure of the Advocates Remuneration Order, and whether the court should entertain the summons absent that compliance. The court found no evidence of the mandatory written notice of objection or of the taxing officer recording and forwarding reasons, and held that the court's jurisdiction depended on compliance with that procedure. The Chamber Summons was dismissed with costs. The judgment is a first-instance procedural ruling; no authorities were cited.

Key legal issues

#
01

Compliance with paragraph 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Holding

The applicant did not comply with paragraph 11; there was no evidence of notice in writing to the taxing officer or of the taxing officer recording and forwarding reasons.

Reasoning

Paragraph 11 requires an objector to give written notice within fourteen days of the taxing decision and requires the taxing officer to record and forward reasons. The court found no evidence of this procedure in the supporting affidavit or the record, and the ruling of 13/6/2022 made no mention of the requisite notice. The procedure, including its timelines, is mandatory.

p. 2
02

Jurisdiction to entertain the reference

Holding

The court should not entertain the summons before compliance with paragraph 11, as compliance confers jurisdiction.

Reasoning

The court held that the law prescribes the procedure, including timelines, for objecting to a taxing officer's decision, and that the court's jurisdiction depends on compliance with that procedure. Since the procedure was not exhausted, the reference could not be entertained on its merits and had to be dismissed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party objecting to a taxing officer's decision must first comply with paragraph 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order - giving written notice of objection within 14 days and obtaining the taxing officer's reasons - before applying to a judge; the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a reference filed without that compliance.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Chambers Summons dated 21/2/2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the summons to the respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2014, Sections 3A and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 51 rule 1 Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Pere v Gicheru & another (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E071 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 7291 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Chamber Summons dated 21/6/2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7291/eng@2024-11-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.