Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (notice of motion dated 21/11/2022)· [2024] KEELC 7206 (KLR)

Sankale v Registrar of Lands Ngong & another; Mwaniki & another (Administrator) (Estate of Jona Keiru Mwaniki) (Environment & Land Case E085 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 7206 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
4 November 2024
569 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kajiado court refused to pause a land dispute despite pending forgery investigations, confirming civil and criminal cases can run at the same time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The interested parties, administrators of the estate of the deceased registered owner of land parcel Kajiado/Loodariak/867, moved the court by notice of motion dated 21/11/2022 seeking (1) a stay of the civil proceedings pending conclusion of criminal proceedings against the plaintiff at CID Office Ngong, where he is suspected of possession of a forged title deed, and (2) a temporary injunction restraining the plaintiff from entering, trespassing on or interfering with their quiet possession of the suit property, plus costs. The motion, anchored on Article 45 of the Constitution, the Civil Procedure Act, the Limitation of Actions Act, the Land Registration Act and enabling provisions, was supported by an affidavit and six annexures asserting that their deceased father was registered on 11/6/1990, died on 29/11/2006 without transferring the land, and that the Land Registrar confirmed their title as authentic and the plaintiff's as a forgery. The application was unopposed - no replying affidavit or grounds of opposition were filed. Nevertheless, the court found the motion without merit. First, Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code permits criminal and civil proceedings on the same issue to run concurrently, so pending criminal investigations were no ground for a stay. Second, Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution, Sections 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act and Section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act require land cases to be heard expeditiously; staying the suit to await possibly lengthy criminal proceedings would defeat those provisions. The court dismissed the motion with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether civil proceedings should be stayed pending criminal proceedings on the same subject matter

Holding

No - criminal and civil proceedings may run concurrently under Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code, and a stay would defeat the constitutional and statutory imperative of expeditious disposal of land cases

Reasoning

The court invoked Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code, which provides that matters in issue in criminal proceedings being also in issue in civil proceedings is not a ground for stay, prohibition or delay. It further relied on Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution, Sections 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act and Section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act, which require justice not to be delayed and land cases to be determined expeditiously. Because criminal proceedings may last long, a stay would defeat those provisions.

p. 2
02

Whether an unopposed application should automatically be allowed

Holding

No - the court may reject an unopposed application on its own merits

Reasoning

The motion attracted no replying affidavit or grounds of opposition, yet the court held that even though unopposed, the application lacked merit on its face. This demonstrates that a party bears the burden of establishing entitlement to discretionary relief regardless of whether the application is opposed; the court is not obliged to grant prayers simply because they are uncontroverted.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The pendency of criminal proceedings on the same subject matter is not a ground to stay civil proceedings
  • Land cases must be heard and determined expeditiously and should not be stayed pending possibly lengthy criminal proceedings

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 21/11/2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 45
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(b)
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 6 and 7
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1, rules 5, 6 and 14
  • Limitation of Actions ActSections 7 and 8
  • Land Registration ActSections 24-26
  • Criminal Procedure CodeSection 193A
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 3
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 45 of the Constitution; Sections 1A, 3A, 6 and 7 of the Civil Procedure Act; Sections 7 and 8 of the Limitation of Actions Act; Sections 24-26 of the Land Registration Act; Order 1 rules 5, 6 and 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sankale v Registrar of Lands Ngong & another; Mwaniki & another (Administrator) (Estate of Jona Keiru Mwaniki) (Environment & Land Case E085 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 7206 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment (notice of motion dated 21/11/2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7206/eng@2024-11-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.