Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the extract (ELC at Kakamega)· [2024] KEELC 7056 (KLR)

Benjamin Barasa Wafula v Plaintiffs and Others (Amended Notice of Motion dated 26th February 2024)

Environment and Land Court
24 October 2024
1,284 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Kakamega dismissed a land dispute application, ruling you cannot substitute deceased parties in a case that has abated without first reviving it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By Amended Notice of Motion dated 26th February 2024, the 57th Defendant, Benjamin Barasa Wafula, sought ex parte priority hearing, a stay restraining the Plaintiffs and 1st to 7th Defendants from intermeddling with and building on LR. No. Ndivisi/Muchi/1253 up to 1400 (claimed as the uncompensated intestate land of the late Cheloti Kisaka), orders of arrest for contempt of earlier court orders, substitution of deceased Plaintiffs by their families or nominees, and costs. The application was supported by his affidavit and grounds recounting colonial-era Native Tribunal proceedings and alleged under-compensation under Kenya Gazette No. 1710 of 12th June 1970. The Applicant relied wholly on his papers; the 8th to 56th Defendants declined to participate; counsel for the Plaintiffs opposed, noting the Applicant was not a plaintiff, that deceased parties had been substituted, and that the Busia court had barred the Applicant from filing interlocutory applications. The court noted the matter was filed in the High Court at Bungoma on 7th November 2012 and transferred multiple times, most recently to Kakamega by order of Justice O. A. Angote, PJ ELC, on 7th June 2023. It found that the Second to Sixth Plaintiffs' cases had abated on 14th February 2024 and had not been revived, so substitution was impossible and no orders could issue against them. Urging the parties to pursue hearing of the main suit rather than interlocutory applications, the court dismissed the application with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether substitution of deceased parties is permissible where their cases have abated and not been revived

Holding

Substitution was impermissible because the Second to Sixth Plaintiffs' cases were marked abated on 14th February 2024 and had not been revived, and no orders could issue against parties who had ceased to be parties.

Reasoning

The court reviewed the record and found that the cases of the Second to Sixth Plaintiffs were marked abated on 14th February 2024 and had not since been revived. Since abatement extinguishes party status, substitution in an abated suit is not possible without first reviving the suit, and no orders can be made against persons who ceased to be parties with effect from the date of abatement.

p. 4
02

Whether the court should grant the interlocutory orders sought in the Amended Notice of Motion

Holding

The application was dismissed for lack of merit, with the court directing that the parties pursue hearing of the main suit rather than interlocutory applications.

Reasoning

The court noted the matter's long history since filing in the High Court at Bungoma on 7th November 2012 and its transfers between courts. Directions had already been given for paginated trial bundles and the matter scheduled for mention to fix a hearing date. The court held parties must stop filing unnecessary interlocutory applications and have the main suit heard and determined on its merits.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • There can be no substitution of a party in an abated suit unless the suit is first revived.
  • No orders can be made against parties who ceased to be parties upon abatement of their cases.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Amended Notice of Motion dated 26th February 2024 dismissed
  2. 2.Costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction following transfer by order of Justice O. A. Angote, PJ ELC dated 7th June 2023

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Benjamin Barasa Wafula v Plaintiffs and Others (Amended Notice of Motion dated 26th February 2024)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the extract (ELC at Kakamega). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7056/eng@2024-10-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.