Kimani v Kiarie (Environment and Land Appeal E004 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 7015 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Environment and Land Court struck out a tenant's appeal because the law gives no automatic appeal right from a Rent Tribunal complaint—only from a formal reference.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Competence of the appeal under Section 15 of Cap 301
The appeal was incompetent as it arose from a Section 12(4) complaint, not a reference, and no leave to appeal was sought or obtained.
Section 15 confers a right of appeal only on parties to a reference, defined by Section 2 as a reference under Section 6 of the Act. The dispute before the tribunal was a complaint under Section 12(4). Leave to appeal, obtainable from the tribunal as a subordinate court, was never sought. The appeal was therefore premature, misconceived and void.
Loss of profit claim
The tribunal did not err in refusing the claim; it was unpleaded special damages and beyond the tribunal's jurisdiction.
Loss of profit is special damages requiring particularised pleading and strict proof. The reference merely averred loss of business without particulars. Moreover, the tribunal is a creature of statute whose jurisdiction is circumscribed by Section 12(1), and such a claim lies only before a conventional court.
Repairs and improvements claim
The claim failed for want of evidence of the landlord's consent.
Under Section 12(g) repairs are the landlord's mandate, and Section 12(l) allows compensation for improvements carried out with the landlord's consent. No consent or authority was tendered, and the Appellant bore the burden of proof under Sections 107, 108 and 109 of the Evidence Act.
Fair hearing
No breach of the right to a fair hearing was established.
The parties consented to canvass the reference, application and counterclaim by written submissions, so the Appellant forfeited the right to tender further evidence or call witnesses. His failure to join the virtual session on 16th November 2023 was due to his own connectivity problems and he never sought review before the tribunal.
Alleged authorization of termination
The tribunal did not authorize termination of the tenancy.
Clause (iii) of the tribunal's judgment merely directed that due process of law be strictly followed should the landlord decide to terminate or alter the tenancy; it did not sanction termination or disregard the Appellant's investment.
Legal principles established
#- A party to a complaint under Section 12(4) of Cap 301 has no automatic right of appeal to the ELC; only a party to a reference under Section 6 may appeal as of right under Section 15, and leave is required otherwise.
- A right of appeal must be expressly conferred by statute and cannot be inferred or implied.
- Special damages must be specially pleaded and strictly proved.
Court orders
#- 1.The Appeal is incompetent and misconceived.
- 2.The Appeal be and is hereby struck out.
- 3.Each party shall bear own costs.
- On appeal from
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Reference dated 24th August 2023
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 15 of the Landlord & Tenants (Shops, Hotels & Catering Establishment) Act, Chapter 301 Laws of Kenya
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kimani v Kiarie (Environment and Land Appeal E004 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 7015 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Environment and Land Appeal E004 of 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7015/eng@2024-10-24
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.