Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowed· [2024] KEELC 6886 (KLR)

Joseph Mwirigi Kaburu t/a Mwirigi Kaburu & Co. Advocates v County Government of Meru (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 19 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 6886 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
16 October 2024
799 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court converted a law firm's taxed fee certificate into a judgment for Kshs 939,600, plus 14% yearly interest, because the client never objected.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant advocate, Mwirigi Kaburu, moved the court by notice of application dated 31.7.2024 seeking judgment of Kshs 939,600/= against the respondent pursuant to a certificate of taxation dated 1.7.2024, together with interest from the date of filing the application until payment in full. The advocate's firm had acted for the respondent in Meru CMCC No 421 of 2014. Although served, the respondent filed no response, no reference under paragraph 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2014, and no appeal against the certificate of costs, and did not dispute the retainer. The applicant relied on Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and case law establishing that a certificate of taxation is final as to the amount certified unless set aside or altered, and that judgment may be entered where retainer is undisputed. The court framed two issues: whether the certificate of costs should be adopted as judgment, and whether interest at 14% per annum from 31.7.2024 should be awarded. Relying on paragraph 7 of the Remuneration Order and authorities including Otieno Ragot and Musyoka & Wambua, the court held that the applicant had met the principles for entry of judgment. Judgment was entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs 939,600/= with interest at 14% per annum from 31.7.2024 until payment in full. The judgment was delivered at Meru on 16 October 2024 by C K Nzili J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Adoption of the certificate of costs as judgment

Holding

Judgment was entered for the certified sum of Kshs 939,600/= as the respondent neither filed a reference nor disputed the retainer.

Reasoning

Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act makes a certificate of taxation final unless set aside or altered. The applicant demonstrated compliance with the procedural requirements through annexures including the bill of costs, objection, taxing master's ruling and certificate of costs. No reference under paragraph 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order was filed, and retainer was undisputed, so judgment on the certificate was proper.

p. 2
02

Entitlement to interest at 14% per annum

Holding

Interest at 14% per annum was awarded with effect from 31.7.2024 until payment in full.

Reasoning

Paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order permits an advocate to charge interest at 14% on disbursements and costs from the expiration of one month from delivery of the bill. Supported by Otieno Ragot & Co. Advocates v National Bank of Kenya, the court found the rate applicable and awarded it from the date of filing the application as sought.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of the taxing officer is final as to the amount of costs covered thereby unless set aside or altered by the court, and where retainer is not disputed judgment may be entered for the certified sum.
  • An advocate may charge interest at 14% on disbursements and costs from the expiration of one month from delivery of the bill to the client.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered against the respondent in favour of the applicant for Kshs 939,600/= with interest at 14% per annum with effect from 31.7.2024 until payment in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(2)
  • Advocate's Remuneration Order 2014Paragraph 11
  • Advocate's Remuneration OrderParagraph 7

Cases cited (9)

  • Gichuki Kingara & Co. Advocates v Mugoya Construction and Engineering Ltd
    [2015] eKLR
  • Macharia Njeri Advocate v CCK as cited in Kagwimi Kang'ethe & Co. Advocates v Penelope Combos & another
    [2014] eKLR
  • Kunjuga v Kangaru & another
    Misc Application E011 of 2022 [2023] KEELC 246 (Ruling) 26th January 2023
  • Mario Rossi v Salama Beach Hotel Ltd
    (2018) eKLR
  • Otieno Ragot & Co. Advocates v National Bank of Kenya
    [2022] eKLR
  • Musyoka & Wambua Advocates v Rustam Hira Advocate
    [2006] eKLR
  • Lubulellah and Associates Advocates v N.K Brother Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • Lubullelah & Associates Advocates v Vinayak Builders Ltd
    Commercial Misc E599 of 2022 [2024] KEHC 6287 (KLR)
  • Lesinko Njoroge & Gathogo advocate v Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd
    [2021] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2014

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joseph Mwirigi Kaburu t/a Mwirigi Kaburu & Co. Advocates v County Government of Meru (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 19 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 6886 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/6886/eng@2024-10-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.