Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2024] KEELC 6661 (KLR)

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission v Nesco Services Limited & 3 others; National Bank of Kenya (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case E211 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 6661 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 September 2024
2,441 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi, delivered by M.D. Mwangi J on 24th September 2024, determines two applications in a suit by the Plaintiff (an investigator deponent indicates the National Land Commission) concerning LR No. 209/13557 (I.R 76437) in Nairobi West, alleged to have been irregularly allocated out of public land set aside for a public car park. The 1st and 2nd Defendants applied to strike out the suit as scandalous, frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process, also alleging non-compliance with Orders 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court first disposed of that application. Applying D.T. Dobie, Ramji Magji Gudka and Blue Shield, it held striking out is a drastic remedy reserved for the clearest cases and shams; the pleadings raised triable issues, and allegations of vendetta and bad faith required interrogation at trial, especially as the 1st Defendant had filed a counterclaim. Relying on Microsoft Corporation v Mitsumi Computer Garage, the court held the procedural lapses were curable by amendment, did not go to jurisdiction, and did not warrant striking out; the application was disallowed with no orders as to costs. On the Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 14th December 2023, the court invoked Section 13(7) of the ELC Act and the doctrine of lis pendens (per Ruth Kinyua v Patrick Thuita Gichure) and granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from alienating, further charging, transferring or disposing of the suit property pending hearing of the main suit, with costs of that application in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff's suit is a sham warranting striking out

Holding

The suit is not a sham; it raises triable issues that must be determined at a full hearing.

Reasoning

The court, cautious not to delve into merits, perused the pleadings and supporting documents and could not term the case bogus or false. Serious allegations of vendetta and bad faith require interrogation through cross-examination, and the 1st Defendant has filed a counterclaim. Even one triable issue suffices to defeat striking out.

p. 4
02

Whether procedural non-compliance by the Plaintiff justifies striking out

Holding

The deviations do not go to jurisdiction nor fundamentally prejudice the 1st Defendant and are curable by amendment; they do not warrant striking out.

Reasoning

Applying Ringera J's exposition in Microsoft Corporation v Mitsumi, the court held rules of procedure are handmaidens of justice. The alleged violations of Orders 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules are curable omissions remediable by amendment of the plaint and do not nullify the proceedings.

p. 4
03

Whether interim preservation orders should issue over the suit property

Holding

Yes; an interlocutory injunction restraining alienation, further charging, transfer or disposal of the suit property was issued pending determination of the suit.

Reasoning

Section 13(7) of the ELC Act empowers the court to grant interim preservation orders, consistent with the doctrine of lis pendens as embraced in Ruth Kinyua v Patrick Thuita Gichure. At the interlocutory stage the court preserves the state of things without making conclusive findings, to prevent defeat of the suit by alienation pendent lite.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Striking out a suit is a drastic remedy to be exercised sparingly and only in obviously hopeless cases; procedural omissions that do not go to jurisdiction or fundamentally prejudice the adverse party are curable and do not warrant striking out.
  • The ELC may grant interim preservation orders, aligned with the doctrine of lis pendens, to preserve the substratum of a suit pending final determination.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 1st and 2nd Defendants' application dated 19th February 2024 seeking to strike out the Plaintiff's suit is disallowed with no orders as to costs
  2. 2.An interlocutory injunction pending the hearing and determination of the suit restraining the 1st Defendant by itself, agents, servants and/or employees or any other person from alienating, further charging, transferring or disposing of the suit property located in Nairobi West Area, off Lang'ata Road
  3. 3.The costs of the Plaintiff's application dated 14th December 2023 shall be in cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 3 rule 2
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 4 rule 1(f)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 4 rule 3
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13(7)
  • Judicature ActSection 3(1)
  • Indian Transfer of Property Act (ITPA)repealed provision on lis pendens

Cases cited (6)

  • Ramji Magji Gudka Ltd v Alfred Morfat Michira & 2 others
    (2003) eKLR
  • D.T. Dobie & Company (Kenya) Ltd v Muchina
    (1982) 1 KLR
  • Blue Shield Insurance Company Ltd v Joseph Mboya Oguttu
    (2009) KLR
  • Wenlock v Moloney
    (1965) 2 ALL ER 871
  • Microsoft Corporation v Mitsumi Computer Garage Ltd & Ano
    (2001) KLR 470
  • Ruth Kinyua v Patrick Thuita Gichure & Ano
    (2015) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 13(7) of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission v Nesco Services Limited & 3 others; National Bank of Kenya (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case E211 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 6661 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/6661/eng@2024-09-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.