Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELCL E009 of 2023· [2024] KEELC 6645 (KLR)

Muriakiara v Ngugi (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E009 of 2023 & Environment & Land Case E11B of 2024 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 6645 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
7 October 2024
4,207 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan father claiming his daughter's land by adverse possession failed to win an injunction, but the court kept the status quo pending full trial.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Thika (G K Kemei, J) deals with two applications arising from a dispute between a father (plaintiff) and daughter (defendant) over Dagoretti/Kinoo/2530, registered in the defendant's name and developed with Elma Apartments. The plaintiff, claiming occupation since 2009 and a right by adverse possession, sought an interlocutory injunction restraining eviction, disposal or interference. The defendant, domiciled abroad, averred the plaintiff and his late wife merely managed the property as her agents, collected rent into a joint Family Bank account, and resided elsewhere on Dagoretti/Kinoo/3976. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and Nguruman, the court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case: no evidence of occupation since 2009 was tendered, and his true residence elsewhere was uncontroverted; irreparable harm and balance of convenience therefore fell away. Nonetheless, invoking Order 40, the court directed that status quo be maintained to preserve the substratum of the suit. The defendant's application sought review of the interim orders of 23/10/2023, striking out of the Originating Summons as an abuse of process, and perjury findings and referral of the plaintiff to the ODPP. The court held the interim order was spent, refused to strike out the adverse possession claim as it discloses a reasonable cause of action fit for trial, and held that perjury, being a criminal offence under Section 108 of the Penal Code, falls outside the court's land jurisdiction. The plaintiff's motion was allowed in terms of maintaining status quo; the defendant's motion was dismissed; each party, being related, was ordered to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Temporary injunction - prima facie case

Holding

Plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case

Reasoning

The Plaintiff claimed occupation since 2009 but tendered no evidence of entry or occupation; his own photographs showed the Defendant's Elma Apartments; the Defendant's claim that he resides on Dagoretti/Kinoo/3976 was uncontroverted. On the Giella and Nguruman tests, the Plaintiff failed at the first hurdle and the court could not reach irreparable harm or balance of convenience in his favour.

p. 4
02

Review of interim orders

Holding

Prayer for review disallowed; order spent

Reasoning

The interim order issued on 23/10/2023 subsisted only until the inter partes hearing, which had taken place. The order therefore spent itself and there was no basis to review it under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

03

Striking out of Originating Summons

Holding

Application to strike out dismissed

Reasoning

Striking out is a draconian jurisdiction to be used sparingly and in the clearest of cases. An adverse possession claim raises a reasonable cause of action; the Plaintiff must prove it at trial. Natural justice requires that a litigant not be driven from the seat of justice without a hearing.

p. 7
04

Jurisdiction over alleged perjury

Holding

Court lacks jurisdiction over the criminal offence of perjury

Reasoning

The Court's jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act covers environment and land use, occupation and title. Perjury under Section 108 of the Penal Code is a criminal matter outside that mandate.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • An adverse possession claim on its face raises a reasonable cause of action and cannot be struck out summarily
  • If no prima facie case is established, irreparable injury and balance of convenience need not be considered

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 19/10/2023 is allowed in terms of maintaining status quo
  2. 2.The Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 11/12/2023 is unmerited and dismissed
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 rule 1
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 2 rule 15
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 45
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 80
  • Penal CodeSection 108
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)

Cases cited (10)

  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Company Ltd
    [1973] EA 58
  • Paul Gitonga Wanjau v Gathuthis Tea Factory Company Ltd & 2 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    CA No.77 of 2012 [2014] eKLR
  • Mrao Ltd v First American Bank of Kenya Ltd
    [2003] eKLR
  • Moses C. Muhia Njoroge & 2 Others v Jane W. Lesaloi and 5 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Stek Cosmetics Limited v Family Bank Limited & Another
    [2020] eKLR
  • Moses Kibiego Yator v Eco-Bank Kenya Limited & 2 Others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Kivanga Estates Limited v National Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Muchanga Investment Ltd v Safaris Unlimited (Africa) Ltd & 2 Others
    [2009] eKLR
  • Beinosi Wiyley
    1973 SA 721 [SCA]
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Muriakiara v Ngugi (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E009 of 2023 & Environment & Land Case E11B of 2024 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 6645 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELCL E009 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/6645/eng@2024-10-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.