Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedJudicial Review Case No. 117 of 2016· [2024] KEELC 6604 (KLR)

Leting & 2 others (Suing as Executors of the Estate of Joseph Tendenei arap Leting) v National Land Commission; Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme & another (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 11 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 6604 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
3 October 2024
3,512 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled the National Land Commission can review even private land titles if they originated from public land, dismissing the owners' bid to stop the review.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The exparte applicants, executors of the estate of Joseph Tendenei Arap Leting (deceased), sought judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, a declaration and a stay to stop the National Land Commission from reviewing the grant over L.R. 209/6506/1, registered in the deceased's name, pursuant to a public notice of 22.1.2016 advertising a hearing for 27.2.2016. They argued the notice was defective, too short, did not disclose the complaint, breached natural justice, and that the Commission lacked jurisdiction because the land was private and protected by indefeasibility of title. The Commission responded that it had mandate under Section 14 of the National Land Commission Act to review grants of public land, that no hearing ever took place (the advertised date was a Saturday, an error explained to the estate's representatives), and that the applicants would have their opportunity at the review. The 1st interested party, the Trustees Kenya Railways Staff Benefits Scheme, claimed the land was part of a public parcel vested in it, alienated unprocedurally to the deceased. The court framed two issues: breach of the right to a fair hearing, and the Commission's jurisdiction. It found no hearing took place, so the applicants' fears were anticipatory and unfounded. On jurisdiction, it held that Article 68(c)(v) of the Constitution and Section 14 of the Act empower the Commission to review grants of public land, including land converted to private land, designed to right the wrongs of post-independence land grabbing. The court declined to interrogate the merits of acquisition, which belong to the review proceedings. The judicial review application was found unmerited and dismissed with costs to the Respondent and the 1st Interested Party.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the exparte applicants' right to a fair hearing was breached by the Commission's notice

Holding

No breach occurred; no hearing took place on 27.2.2016 and the applicants' fears were anticipatory

Reasoning

The notice advertised a hearing on 27.2.2016, which turned out to be a Saturday. No hearing took place; the error was explained to the deceased's representatives on 24.2.2016. The applicants were resisting any hearing at all, so their apprehension of a breach of natural justice was premature and unfounded at the time of filing the suit.

p. 6
02

Whether the National Land Commission had jurisdiction to review the grant over L.R. 209/6506/1

Holding

The Commission had statutory jurisdiction to review the grant as the complaint alleged the land was public land converted to private land

Reasoning

Article 68(c)(v) of the Constitution and Section 14 of the National Land Commission Act empower the Commission to review grants or dispositions of public land to establish their propriety or legality, including titles birthed by unlawful conversion of public land. It was sufficient that the scheme lodged a complaint on the basis that the land was public land at the time of alienation; the merits of acquisition are for the review, not the judicial review court.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Judicial review is concerned with the decision-making process, not the merits of the decision itself
  • The National Land Commission has jurisdiction to review grants of public land including land unlawfully converted from public to private land
  • The audi alteram partem rule requires prior notification of proposed administrative action and of any hearing

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Judicial Review proceedings are dismissed with costs to the Respondent and the 1st Interested Party

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 68(c)(v)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 40, 47, 48, 50(1), 60, 68(c)
  • National Land Commission ActSections 6, 14(1)-(9)
  • Fair Administrative Action ActSection 4
  • Kenya Railways Corporation Act Cap 397Section 14(4) & (5)

Cases cited (18)

  • Nairobi Permanent Markets Society and Others Versus Salima Enterprises and Others
    [1995-98) 1 EA 232
  • Bwambale and Another Versus Matte and Others
    [2005] 2EA 49
  • Moya Drift Farm Limited Versus Theuri
    [1973] EA 114
  • Republic Versus the Director of Medical Services
    Nairobi High Court Civil Case Number 38 of 2015
  • Suchan Investments Limited – Versus – The Ministry of National Heritage and Culture and Others
    Civil Appeal Number 46 of 2012
  • Republic Versus Energy Regulatory Commission
    High Court Civil Case Number 355 of 2015
  • Kenya Human Rights Commission – Versus Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordinations Board
    High Court Civil Case Number 495 of 2015
  • Republic vs. Land Registrar Mombasa & 2 Others Expate Bhangra Limited
    [2012] eKLR
  • Joseph Mungai Gichuru & Another v. Mathaara Mwangi & 4 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Muktar Saman Olow –v- National Land Commission
    JR 376 of 2014
  • Republic v National Land Commission Exparte Krystalline Salt Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Compar Investment Ltd v National Land Commission & 3 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Satrose Ayuma & 11 Others vs. Registered Trustees of the Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme & 3 Others
    Petition No. 65 of 2010 eKLR
  • Bernad Muia Tom Kiala vs. Speaker of the County Assembly of Machakos & 4 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Municipal Council Of Mombasa V Republic And Another
    2002 eKLR
  • Republic -vs- Secretary of State for Education and Science ex parte Avon County Council
    (1991) 1 All ER 282
  • Republic v County Director of Education, Nairobi & 4 Others Ex-parte Abdukadir Elmi Robleh
    [2018] eKLR
  • Republic v National Land Commission Ex-parte Holborn Properties Limited
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction of the High Court/Environment and Land Court over the National Land Commission; constitutional and statutory basis of the impugned mandate being Article 68(c)(v) of the Constitution and Section 14 of the National Land Commission Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Leting & 2 others (Suing as Executors of the Estate of Joseph Tendenei arap Leting) v National Land Commission; Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme & another (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 11 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 6604 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Judicial Review Case No. 117 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/6604/eng@2024-10-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.