Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 21st December, 2023 (appeal pending before the Environment and Land Court)· [2024] KEELC 6504 (KLR)

Mbatia & another v National Environment Management Authority & 102 others (Environment and Land Appeal 34 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 6504 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
3 October 2024
4,317 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Once you withdraw an appeal in Kenya, court orders issued while it was pending lapse, and you cannot use them to pursue contempt.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 2nd Respondent/Applicant moved the Environment and Land Court by Notice of Motion dated 21st December 2023, under Section 5 of the Judicature Act and Section 29 of the Environment and Land Court Act, seeking a finding that the 1st Appellant, Hon Robert Mbatia, and the Director General of NEMA were in contempt of orders issued on 19th June 2023 restraining further development of a social hall on Uhuru Phase IV Playground. The orders sought committal, detention or fines, and purging of contempt through demolition and restoration. NEMA, through its Director General, conceded the existence of the orders but argued that the appeal had been withdrawn on 31st October 2023, rendering the court functus officio, and that a similar contempt application was pending before the National Environment Tribunal, raising sub judice. The Appellants did not respond. The court framed two issues: its jurisdiction, and whether the 1st Appellant and 1st Respondent were in contempt. On sub judice, it held the two contempt applications concerned different orders by different forums, so no conflicting decisions could arise. On jurisdiction, applying the jurisprudence on withdrawal of suits, it held that once the appeal was withdrawn, no substantive appeal remained and the interim orders of 19th June 2023 - having been issued pending the hearing of the appeal - ceased to have effect. Distinguishing Beijing Industrial Designing and London Distillers, where withdrawals were refused because contempt applications were already pending, the court found the contempt motion here was filed after withdrawal. It concluded it had no jurisdiction, dismissed the Motion, and directed the Applicant to the pending Tribunal contempt application, with no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Sub judice - whether a parallel contempt application before the National Environment Tribunal bars this application

Holding

The plea of sub judice fails because the two applications concern contempt of different orders by different forums, each enforcing its own orders

Reasoning

Applying Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court's guidance in the KNCHR Advisory Opinion, the court found that sub judice requires suits over the same subject matter. Here the Tribunal application concerned contempt of the Tribunal's orders of 24th September 2020, while this application concerned the ELC's orders of 19th June 2023. Each body would be enforcing its own orders, so no conflicting decisions could arise.

p. 5
02

Functus officio and effect of withdrawal of the appeal on the court's jurisdiction to entertain contempt

Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction; upon withdrawal of the appeal, no substantive appeal or subsisting interim orders remained, and the Applicant's remedy lies before the Tribunal

Reasoning

The appeal was withdrawn on 31st October 2023, before the contempt Motion was filed on 21st December 2023. Distinguishing Beijing Industrial Designing and London Distillers, where withdrawals were refused because contempt applications were already pending, the court held that withdrawal here ended the suit. Interim orders issued pending hearing of the appeal ceased to have effect, so any determination of the Motion would be futile; the Applicant should pursue the pending Tribunal contempt application.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an appeal is withdrawn, interim orders issued pending its hearing and determination lapse and the court becomes functus officio; contempt applications founded on such orders cannot be entertained
  • Contempt applications relating to different orders (this Court's versus the Tribunal's) are not sub judice one another since each forum enforces its own orders

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 21st December, 2023 is dismissed with no orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Judicature ActSection 5
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 29
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act (EMCA)Section 130(1)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 25 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 3A

Cases cited (12)

  • Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited
    [1989] eKLR
  • Kalpana H Rawal & 2 Others vs Judicial Service Commission & 2 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Ocheja Emmanuel Dangana vs Hon. Atai Aidoko Aliusman & 4 Others
    Supreme Case No. 11 of 2012
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 Others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Kenya National Commission on Human Rights v Attorney General; Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 16 others (Interested Parties) (Advisory Opinion Reference 1 of 2017)
    [2020] KESC 54 (KLR)
  • Raila Odinga & Others v IEBC & Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs IEBC & 7 Others
    Supreme Court Application No. 16 of 2014
  • Beijing Industrial Designing & Researching Institute v Lagoon Development Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Republic v Export Processing Zones Authority & 2 Others; London Distillers (K) Ltd & 3 Others (Interested Parties) Ex parte Erdermann Property Limited
    [2020] eKLR
  • Priscilla Nyambura Njue vs Geovhem Middle East Ltd; Kenya Bureau of Standards (Interested Party)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Smt. Rais Sultana Begam v Abdul Qadir & Others
  • Mary Njambi Mwangi v Paul Mbogo Karanja & Another
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 5 of the Judicature Act and Section 29 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mbatia & another v National Environment Management Authority & 102 others (Environment and Land Appeal 34 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 6504 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Notice of Motion dated 21st December, 2023 (appeal pending before the Environment and Land Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/6504/eng@2024-10-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.