Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedFair Administrative Action No. 4 of 2017· [2024] KEELC 6359 (KLR)

Mwichwiri Farmers Company Limited v Settlement & 3 others; Lawrence Mwangi Wambooh & 600 other Members of Mwichwiri Farmers Company Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition 09 of 2017) [2024] KEELC 6359 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
3 October 2024
3,379 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Mwichwiri Farmers Company Limited, a land buying company, petitioned the Environment and Land Court at Nyeri seeking declarations that the decision of the Cabinet Secretary for Lands and the Director of Surveys to re-survey land parcel Naromoru/Kiamathage/Block 2 (Mwichwiri), formerly LR No. 9620, without consulting it was unconstitutional under Articles 40 and 47; certiorari to quash the decision; a permanent injunction; nullification of any resulting R.I.M; cancellation of titles issued; and directions to issue titles per a 1989 R.I.M by surveyor P.N. Gichoho Ngugi. The Respondents and Interested Parties (600 shareholders) opposed, showing the resurvey and issuance of titles in 2017 complied with long-standing court orders arising from disputes dating back to 1990, including a consent order before Justice Oguk, a reference to the Kieni Land Disputes Tribunal adopted in 2001, and orders of 4th July 2002 cancelling the earlier R.I.M. The court, per J. O. Olola J, held that the Petitioner had been divested of control over the resurvey after frustrating compliance, that the Petitioner surrendered its main title in 1990 for issuance of individual titles, that it bore but failed to discharge the burden of proving unjustifiable State deprivation of property, and that the administrative action was not illegal, irrational or procedurally improper. The Petition was found to be an abuse of court process and was dismissed with costs to the Respondents on 3rd October 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the resurvey of the suit property infringed Articles 40 and 47 of the Constitution

Holding

No infringement established; the resurvey was carried out in compliance with subsisting court orders and the Petitioner failed to prove illegality, irrationality or procedural impropriety.

Reasoning

The court traced the litigation history from 1990, noting consent orders stopping issuance of titles, a reference to the Kieni Land Disputes Tribunal, and orders of 1st August 2001 authorising the Executive Officer to sign documents for resurvey. The Petitioner had long frustrated implementation, its 2004 application to set aside the orders was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the 2017 survey merely enforced those orders.

p. 7
02

Whether the Petitioner was deprived of its property

Holding

The Petitioner was not deprived; it had surrendered the main title in 1990 for purposes of issuing individual titles to shareholders.

Reasoning

PW1 conceded the main title had been surrendered to the Government in September 1990 for purposes of getting individual titles, and that members had lived on the land for nearly 50 years without titles, with an outcry from Interested Parties demanding their titles. No evidence showed any shareholder deprived of land by the Respondents' actions.

p. 7
03

Whether the Petition was an abuse of court process

Holding

Yes; it was filed to prolong the Petitioner's hold on the suit land.

Reasoning

Given the long history of court orders directing resurvey and issuance of titles, and the cancellation of the 1989 R.I.M by order of 4th July 2002, the court found the Petition had been filed for a nefarious purpose, relying on a cancelled survey to resist enforcement of valid orders.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Article 47 of the Constitution, administrative action is subject to judicial review on the grounds of illegality, irrationality or procedural impropriety.
  • A party asserting deprivation of property under Article 40 bears the burden of demonstrating that the State unjustifiably and unreasonably disentitled lawful owners of their property.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Petition dated 30th June 2017 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the Petition awarded to the Respondents
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 20, 21, 22, 40 and 47 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and Sections 4, 5 and 7 of the Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwichwiri Farmers Company Limited v Settlement & 3 others; Lawrence Mwangi Wambooh & 600 other Members of Mwichwiri Farmers Company Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition 09 of 2017) [2024] KEELC 6359 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Fair Administrative Action No. 4 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/6359/eng@2024-10-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.