Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedChamber Summons Application dated 15th March 2024 (within the principal suit, Machakos ELC)· [2024] KEELC 5997 (KLR)

Kinyanjui & 2 others v Kamau & 2 others; Javisapa Enterprises Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case E060 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 5997 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 September 2024
1,612 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court refused to remove a party who had earlier insisted on joining the case, ruling she must stay until the dispute is fully heard.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This first-instance ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (Christine Ochieng, J) determined a Chamber Summons application dated 15th March 2024 by Jacqueline Njeru, an Interested Party in a land dispute between Danson Njoroge Kinyanjui (plaintiff) and Neema Trust Company Limited (2nd defendant). The Interested Party sought its own removal from the proceedings under Sections 3A and 3B of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 1 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules, contending it lacked interest in the suit - it had obtained judgment and executed against the suit land, Mavoko Town Block 3/2104, which was sold at auction to User Care Limited for Kshs 100,000,000, with related High Court matters resolved by consent - and that the ELC lacked jurisdiction. The plaintiff opposed, arguing the Interested Party had itself sought joinder, filed a defence, and was estopped from withdrawing. The court framed one issue: whether the Interested Party's name should be struck out. Applying Order 1 Rule 10(1) and (2) and the Court of Appeal decision in Civicon Limited v Kivumatt Limited, the court held that a party who voluntarily sought joinder, insisting on its necessity, can only be discharged after the court has heard and determined the matter on merit. It found an element of bad faith in the Interested Party's conduct, held that the dispute over title to land falls squarely within its jurisdiction under Section 13 of the ELC Act, and found the application an abuse of court process. The application was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Interested Party should be struck out from the proceedings under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Holding

The application was dismissed; the Interested Party, having voluntarily sought joinder and filed a defence, remains a party until determination of the suit on merit

Reasoning

The court noted the Interested Party itself sought joinder via a Notice of Motion dated 5th November 2022, which was allowed, then filed a Statement of Defence raising pertinent issues. It later sought to be struck off claiming the court lacked jurisdiction, despite entering consents in related High Court matters during the pendency of the suit. The court found an element of bad faith, held that the dispute over proprietary interest in and title to land falls squarely within its jurisdiction under Section 13 of the ELC Act, and found the application an abuse of process.

p. 3
02

Whether the ELC has jurisdiction over the dispute

Holding

The court holds that the dispute over proprietary interest and title to land falls within its jurisdiction under Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Reasoning

The Interested Party contended the court lacked jurisdiction and could not supervise orders of the High Court, relying on several decisions. The court rejected this, noting that the fulcrum of the dispute revolves around proprietary interest including title to land, which falls squarely within the ambit of Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, and that issues of fraud touching on the suit land also need to be dealt with by the court.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who voluntarily sought joinder insisting it was a necessary party can only be discharged from the suit after the court has heard and determined the matter on merit

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Chamber Summons Application dated 15th March 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 3A
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 3B
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 14
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 10(1) and (2)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13

Cases cited (6)

  • Joseph Kibowen Chemjor v William C Kisera
    [2013] eKLR
  • R v Karisa Chengo & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Cooperative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna & 5 others
    Civil Appeal No 83 of 2016 [2017] eKLR
  • Robert Alai Onyango v Cabinet Secretary in Charge of Health & 7 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Tom Onyango Omboya v Zum Zum Investment Limited & 3 others
    [2021] eKLR
  • Civicon Limited v Kivumatt Limited & 2 others
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act; Sections 3A and 3B of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 1 Rule 14 (and Order 1 Rule 10(1) and (2)) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kinyanjui & 2 others v Kamau & 2 others; Javisapa Enterprises Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case E060 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 5997 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Chamber Summons Application dated 15th March 2024 (within the principal suit, Machakos ELC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5997/eng@2024-09-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.