Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the excerpt· [2024] KEELC 5762 (KLR)

Abdille & another v Bungale/Wale Muungano Group & another (Environment and Land Appeal E026 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 5762 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 July 2024
1,921 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants, lessees of grazing land under five-year lease agreements dated 25 July 2023, moved the Environment and Land Court at Malindi by notice of motion dated 1 July 2024 seeking a stay of execution of a ruling delivered by Hon. Ivy Wasike PM on 25 June 2024, an order restraining their eviction from the suit property, and a stay of proceedings pending appeal. The magistrate's ruling had granted an interlocutory mandatory injunction effectively terminating the leases before the main suit was heard, on findings that the Applicants failed to pay rent, sublet and overstocked community land, polluted water sources, and disregarded the termination notice. The Respondents maintained the applicants breached the leases, causing disease outbreaks and community conflict. The Applicants argued, among other things, that the Self-Help Groups lacked locus standi to sue without incorporating their officials, and cited Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and authorities on stay of proceedings pending appeal. E. K. Makori J declined to fault the magistrate's exercise of discretion, holding that the Applicants breached the lease terms, came to court with unclean hands, and that stoppage orders would permit continued environmental degradation, waterborne disease and community feuds while the main suit remained pending. The locus standi issue was left to be raised in the Lower Court as a preliminary point of law or by striking out the suit, and the court recommended Court-Annexed Mediation or Alternative Justice Systems. The application dated 1 July 2024 was dismissed with costs to abide the outcome of the main suit in the Lower Court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the interlocutory mandatory injunction issued by the magistrate should be stayed pending appeal

Holding

The application for stay was dismissed; the magistrate's discretionary decision could not be faulted as it was founded on the Applicants' breach of the leases and environmental harm

Reasoning

The trial magistrate found the leased land was community land, and the Applicants' failure to pay rent, overgrazing, subletting and water contamination constituted sufficient and special circumstances for an interlocutory mandatory injunction. The Judge held the Applicants came to court with unclean hands, and that stopping the injunction would allow continued land degradation, disease outbreaks and community feuds while the main suit remained pending.

p. 4
02

Whether the Self-Help Groups had locus standi to sue without incorporating their officials

Holding

The locus standi issue was not determined on the appeal; it should be raised in the Lower Court as a preliminary point of law or by striking out the suit

Reasoning

The trial magistrate had declined to address locus standi because it was raised in submissions rather than appropriately pleaded. The Judge appreciated the authorities cited on how Self-Help Groups must sue through their officials but held the issue remained open for determination in the Lower Court.

03

Whether the Lower Court proceedings should be stayed under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

Stay of proceedings was refused as the main suit is still pending and stay was not in the parties' interest

Reasoning

The Applicants invoked Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Global Tours & Travels principles, arguing an appeal from interlocutory proceedings warranted a stay. The court held that the main suit still pends before the Lower Court and any stoppage orders would not be in the interest of the parties, given ongoing environmental degradation and community tensions.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A mandatory injunction will not normally be granted at the interlocutory stage in the absence of special circumstances, and only in clear cases
  • An appellate court will not fault a trial magistrate's exercise of discretion where it was based on the materials placed before her

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 1 July 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to abide by the outcome of the main suit in the Lower Court

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6

Cases cited (11)

  • Alfred Njau v City Council of Nairobi
    [1983] eKLR
  • Kipsiwo Community Self-Help Group v Attorney General and six others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Senti Kumi Community Self Help v Kenya Maritime Authority & another
    [2019] eKLR
  • Global Tours & Travels Limited; Nairobi HC Winding up Cause No. 43 of 2000
  • Consolidated Marine v Nampijja & another
    Civil App. No. 93 of 1989 (Nairobi)
  • Kenya Breweries Limited & Another v Washington O. Okeyo
    Civil Appeal No. 332 of 2000 [2002] 1 EA 109
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd
    [1973] EA 358
  • Kenya Commercial Finance Co. Ltd v Afraha Education Society
    [2001] E.A
  • Nguruman Ltd v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Paul Gitonga Wanjau v Gathuthi Tea Factory Co. Ltd & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Locabail International Finance Ltd. v Agroexport and others
    [1986] 1 ALL ER 901
On appeal from
Magistrates Court (trial before Hon. Ivy Wasike PM)
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate/interlocutory jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over appeals from the Magistrates' Court (specific provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Abdille & another v Bungale/Wale Muungano Group & another (Environment and Land Appeal E026 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 5762 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5762/eng@2024-07-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.