Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEELC 5631 (KLR)

Terakate Properties v Develco Investments Limited (In Liquidation) & 2 others; Mucheru & 25 others (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 3 of 2009) [2024] KEELC 5631 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
18 July 2024
1,251 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court refused to let ten land buyers join an old land case, saying they should file their own claim instead.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants, describing themselves as proposed 27th to 36th Interested Parties, applied by notice of motion dated 23rd April 2023 under Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules to be enjoined in a suit that has been in court since 2009. They deposed, through Julius Peter Migwi, that they purchased various plots from the Plaintiff and that consent orders recorded in the suit bound them without affording them a hearing. The Plaintiff opposed through a preliminary objection and grounds of opposition, arguing inter alia that the claims were time-barred, offended Order 25 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and that there was no evidence the suit land still existed. The 1st and 2nd Interested Parties also opposed, deposing that the consent had been executed, the land subdivided and transferred to third parties, including Kingdom Seekers Fellowship which had erected a mega church. The Applicants relied on Leonard Kimeu Mwanthi v Rukaria M'twerandu and David Kiptugen v Commissioner of Lands. A. Omollo J examined the consent orders of 7th March 2022 and 21st February 2022 and held that they referred only to the 6th to 26th Interested Parties and did not extinguish third-party rights; the Applicants remained free to file their own claim against the Plaintiff and could seek preservation orders under Order 40. The application was found without merit and dismissed with no order on costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicants satisfied the threshold for joinder as interested parties

Holding

The application was dismissed; the Applicants failed to show how the consent orders infringed rights independently acquired, and the consent expressly referred only to the 6th–26th Interested Parties.

Reasoning

The court examined the consent orders of 7th March 2022 and 21st February 2022 and found they did not extinguish the Applicants' rights. The Applicants could still file their own claim against the Plaintiff, and could seek preservation orders under Order 40 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The affidavit in support did not explain the alleged infringement, and the decree had already been executed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking joinder must expressly demonstrate the interest claimed and how the orders sought to be impugned affect their rights; merely asking to be included is insufficient.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 23rd April, 2023 is dismissed with no order on costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B and 3A
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 51
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 25 Rule 2
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 40

Cases cited (2)

  • Leonard Kimeu Mwanthi v Rukaria M'twerandu; Nathaniel Kithinji & 4 Others
    (2021) eKLR
  • David Kiptugen v Commissioner of Lands & 4 Others
    (2016) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Terakate Properties v Develco Investments Limited (In Liquidation) & 2 others; Mucheru & 25 others (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 3 of 2009) [2024] KEELC 5631 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5631/eng@2024-07-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.