Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2024] KEELC 5607 (KLR)

Muriithi v Kuria (Environment & Land Case 785 of 2007) [2024] KEELC 5607 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
18 July 2024
1,702 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Nairobi landlord won Kshs 3.4 million for a buyer's occupation of his building, but only from when his ownership made the stay unlawful.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, registered proprietor of Nairobi/Block 82/4880, Harambee Sacco, sued the Defendant, a former tenant of the previous proprietor who refused to hand over vacant possession after the purchase. Following an earlier ruling of 12th July 2018 ordering vacant possession, and eviction orders issued on 20th August 2021, the suit proceeded to formal proof on mesne profits. The Defendant did not file a defence. The Plaintiff, through a Knight Frank valuer (PW1), claimed mesne profits of Kshs 6,471,000 for August 2013 to August 2021, special damages of Kshs 230,000 for eviction costs, and general damages for trespass. The court held that the Defendant's initial occupation was consensual and became wrongful only after the sale fell through; the previous owner recovered rent up to December 2014 and the transfer to the Plaintiff was registered in June 2014, so mesne profits could only run from January 2015 to August 2021. Rejecting the valuer's higher assessments, the court fixed mesne profits at Kshs 30,000 per month (the previous Kshs 25,000 rent plus a reasonable Kshs 5,000 increment), maintained through the Covid period, totalling Kshs 3,400,000. General damages for trespass were refused, as mesne profits and trespass damages cannot both be awarded. Special damages of Kshs 230,000 were granted as specifically pleaded and proved by the auctioneer's receipt. Judgment was entered for the Plaintiff on 18th July 2024 with mesne profits of Kshs 3,400,000, special damages of Kshs 230,000, interest at court rates from the date of filing, and costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Period from which mesne profits are recoverable

Holding

Mesne profits run from January 2015, when the Plaintiff became entitled to possession, to 20th August 2021, not from 2013

Reasoning

The Defendant's initial occupation was with the previous owner's consent; it became wrongful when the sale fell through and the property transferred to the Plaintiff. The previous owner recovered rent up to December 2014, and the transfer was registered on 26th June 2014, so no mesne profits lie for the earlier period.

p. 3
02

Quantum of mesne profits

Holding

Assessed at Kshs 30,000 per month for January 2015 to August 2021, totalling Kshs 3,400,000

Reasoning

Although the valuer assessed Kshs 35,000–40,000 per month, the court held that since the previous rent until December 2014 was Kshs 25,000, a reasonable market increment would not exceed Kshs 5,000; the same rate applied through the Covid period of 2020–2021.

p. 3
03

General damages for trespass

Holding

Refused; mesne profits already awarded

Reasoning

Relying on Christine Nyanchama Oanda v Catholic Diocese of Homa Bay Registered Trustees, the court held a claimant cannot recover both mesne profits and damages for trespass; since mesne profits were awarded, general damages for trespass were not available.

p. 3
04

Special damages for eviction costs

Holding

Awarded at Kshs 230,000

Reasoning

Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved. The Plaintiff pleaded and proved payment of Kshs 230,000 to Bealine Kenya Auctioneers via a receipt letter; in an undefended suit the court had no basis to doubt payment and granted the award.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a party claims both mesne profits and damages for trespass, the court can grant only one, not both; mesne profits must be pleaded and proved
  • A person wrongfully deprived of property is entitled to mesne profits for the period of wrongful occupation, measured at reasonable rent down to the date possession is given
  • Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Mesne profits for the period January 2015 until August 2021 @ Kshs 30000 per month amounting to Kshs 3,400,000
  2. 2.Special damages @ Kshs 230000
  3. 3.Interest at court rates from the date of filing this suit until payment is made in full
  4. 4.Costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 13

Cases cited (5)

  • Attorney General v Halal Meat Products Limited
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kenatco Transport Co. Ltd v Samuel Gikaru Njoroge (Suing on Behalf of the Estate of the late Geoffrey Gikaru Njoroge) & another
    [2021] eKLR
  • Christine Nyanchama Oanda v Catholic Diocese of Homa Bay Registered Trustees
    [2020] eKLR
  • Mistry Valji v Janendra Raichand & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Invergue Investments v Hacketh
    (1995) 3 All ER 842
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction under the Environment and Land Court Act over the suit premises Nairobi/Block 82/4880

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Muriithi v Kuria (Environment & Land Case 785 of 2007) [2024] KEELC 5607 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5607/eng@2024-07-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.