Mawando Limited & another v Thousand Palms Beach Hotel Limited & another; SBM Bank (K) Ltd (Interested Party); Thousand Palms Beach Hotel Limited (Plaintiff to the Counterclaim); Mawando Limited & 3 others (Defendant to the Counterclaim) (Civil Suit 45 of 2012) [2024] KEELC 5504 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Mombasa Environment and Land Court refused to transfer a 12-year-old land dispute to Malindi, finding Mombasa has jurisdiction over Kilifi-located property.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Territorial jurisdiction over a suit where the property is in Kilifi County but registered at the Mombasa Lands Registry under the repealed Registered Titles Act
The Mombasa ELC retains territorial jurisdiction; registration of the title in Mombasa and the location of the 2nd Defendant's office where the fraud allegedly occurred anchor the suit in Mombasa, and the property is within a reasonable distance of the Mombasa court
The court held jurisdiction is donated by the Constitution and statute and cannot be conferred by consent or by the overriding objective. Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Act permits suits where defendants reside or carry on business or where the cause of action arose; here the fraudulent registrations occurred at the 2nd Defendant's Mombasa office. The court also weighed balance of convenience, noting Mombasa is closer to Kikambala than Malindi, and suspected forum shopping given the suit is part-heard twelve years after filing.
Whether an incompetent suit can be transferred to a competent court
No; a court cannot sanctify an incompetent suit through transfer, but on the facts the court found its own jurisdiction intact and therefore dismissed the application
Relying on Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lilian S', Equity Bank v Bruce Mutie Mutuku, Phoenix of East Africa Assurance and Albert Chaurembo Mumba (restating Kagenyi v Musiramo), the court affirmed that jurisdiction must exist at filing and that no order for transfer lies unless the transferring court has jurisdiction. The court nonetheless went on to find that it did have jurisdiction over the matter, given the cause of action and parties' connection to Mombasa, and thus no question of transferring an incompetent suit arose.
Costs of the application
Costs follow the event; the successful 1st Defendant is awarded costs of the application
Invoking Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act and the Harun Mutwiri, Bidco and Hussein Muhumed Sirat decisions, the court applied the settled principle that the successful party is entitled to costs absent compelling reasons. The application having been dismissed, the 1st Defendant, which alone opposed it, was awarded costs payable by the Plaintiffs.
Legal principles established
#- A suit filed in a court lacking jurisdiction cannot be cured by transfer under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act; transfer cannot sanctify an incompetent suit
- Costs follow the event and the successful party is ordinarily entitled to costs
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 27th May, 2024 by the Plaintiffs is found to lack merit and is dismissed with costs
- 2.An order that the Mombasa Environment and Land Court is clothed with the requisite territorial and geographical jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit to its conclusion without further delay
- 3.The part-heard matter to be heard and finalised as scheduled on 30th July, 2024 and 27th November, 2024
- 4.Costs of the Notice of Motion dated 27th May, 2024 awarded to the 1st Defendant, to be paid by the Plaintiffs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution; Environment and Land Court Act, No. 19 of 2011, Sections 4 and 13(1); Sections 3A, 15 & 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Mawando Limited & another v Thousand Palms Beach Hotel Limited & another; SBM Bank (K) Ltd (Interested Party); Thousand Palms Beach Hotel Limited (Plaintiff to the Counterclaim); Mawando Limited & 3 others (Defendant to the Counterclaim) (Civil Suit 45 of 2012) [2024] KEELC 5504 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Notice of Motion application dated 27th May, 2024 (ELC suit filed 2012, Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5504/eng@2024-07-02
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.