Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherOriginating Summons dated 2nd May, 2023 (number not stated in judgment)· [2024] KEELC 5477 (KLR)

Kigen (Suing in His Capacity as Personal Representative of Zarah Chepngetich Tonui - Deceased) v Joseph & another (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5477 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 July 2024
2,657 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out a grandson's land dispute suit because he sued over his grandfather's estate without letters of administration, confirming no grant means no standing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st Respondent raised a preliminary objection dated 30th October, 2023 against an Originating Summons dated 2nd May, 2023 in which the Applicant, a grandson of the late Kipsang Tonui, sought determinations concerning LR No. Kericho/Koiwa/191, including declarations that the land belongs to the deceased's estate and rectification of the register following an alleged irregular transfer to the 1st Respondent in collusion with the Land Registrar, Bomet. The 1st Respondent argued that the Applicant sued over the deceased's land without a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem as required under Sections 81 and 82 of the Law of Succession Act and thus lacked locus standi. The Applicant, who described himself as legal representative of the estate of Zarah Chepngetich Tonui, an heir of Kipsang Tonui, relied on Order 37 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and on Abdilahi Salim Badri v Hemed Mohmaed Mbarak to argue that no grant was needed. The 2nd Respondent filed no submissions. Applying Oraro v Mbaja, the court confirmed the objection was a pure point of law. It distinguished Abdilahi Salim Badri because in that case a grant had issued and the estate had been distributed, whereas here no succession proceedings over Kipsang Tonui's estate had been commenced or the estate distributed. Holding that only persons issued with letters of administration may represent a deceased's estate, the court found the Applicant lacked locus standi, upheld the preliminary objection, struck out the Originating Summons and awarded costs to the 1st Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection qualified as a pure point of law

Holding

The court accepted it did, since it raised the question of locus standi on assumed facts, and the Applicant conceded as much

Reasoning

The court applied Oraro v Mbaja as cited in Ushago Diani Investment Limited v Abdulwahab, holding that a preliminary objection must be a pure point of law argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the other side are correct, and must not rest on disputed facts requiring evidence. The locus standi challenge qualified.

p. 4
02

Whether the Applicant had locus standi to sue on behalf of the estate of Kipsang Tonui without a grant ad litem

Holding

He did not; the suit was a nullity

Reasoning

The Applicant claimed capacity as legal representative of the estate of Zarah Chepngetich Tonui, an heir of Kipsang Tonui, and relied on Order 37 Rule 1 and Abdilahi Salim Badri. The court distinguished that case because there a grant had issued and the estate had been distributed, whereas here no succession proceedings over Kipsang Tonui's estate had been commenced. Only persons issued with letters of administration may represent a deceased's estate.

p. 6
03

Whether Abdilahi Salim Badri v Hemed Mohmaed Mbarak assisted the Applicant

Holding

It was distinguished on its facts

Reasoning

In that case the grant of letters of administration had already been issued, the estate distributed, and the plaintiff was a beneficiary heir in trust of some beneficiaries under a probated will, justifying his standing. Those circumstances are absent here, so the exception recognised there did not apply.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The estate of a deceased person can only be represented in legal proceedings by a person duly authorised, that is, one issued with letters of administration
  • A party without locus standi cannot institute or maintain a suit, and such proceedings are a nullity

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 1st Respondent's preliminary objection dated 30th October, 2023 is upheld
  2. 2.The suit commenced by the Applicant vide the Originating Summons dated 2nd May, 2023 is struck out
  3. 3.Costs to the 1st Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActSections 81, 82, 29
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 27(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 37 Rule 1 (also referred to as Order 31 Rule 1 by the Applicant)

Cases cited (8)

  • Peter Kaukau Asitua and 3 others vs Oleria Mahindu Makunga
    [2021] eKLR
  • Charity Wawira Nderi versus Wazir Auto Limited
    [2023] eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA 696
  • Daykio Plantations Limited v National Bank of Kenya Limited & 2 Others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Abdilahi Salim Badri vs Hemed Mohmaed Mbarak
    [2022] eKLR
  • Ushago Diani Investment Limited v Abdulwahab
    (Environment & Land Case 12 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 20213 (KLR) (27 September 2023) (Ruling)
  • Oraro v Mbaja
    [2005] eKLR 141
  • Julian Adoyo Ongunga & another v Francis Kiberenge Bondeva (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Fanuel Evans Amudavi, Deceased)
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
First-instance jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes; proceedings brought under Order 37 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kigen (Suing in His Capacity as Personal Representative of Zarah Chepngetich Tonui - Deceased) v Joseph & another (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5477 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Originating Summons dated 2nd May, 2023 (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5477/eng@2024-07-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.