Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck Outnot_stated_in_excerpt· [2024] KEELC 5454 (KLR)

Masumbuko v National Bank Kenya Ltd (Environment & Land Case 113 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 5454 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 July 2024
1,814 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court in Mombasa struck out a charge-related commercial dispute, confirming such cases belong in the High Court, not the ELC.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Defendant raised a preliminary objection against the Plaintiff's suit, contending that the Environment and Land Court lacked jurisdiction under Article 162(2) of the Constitution, section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011 and sections 128 and 150 of the Land Act, because the claim arose from a commercial dispute over the nature of a sale and the terms of a formal charge, and that the plaint was an abuse of process. The court set out the classic definition of a preliminary objection from Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd as restated by the Supreme Court in Hassan Ali Joho, and the caution in IEBC v Jane Cheperenger against using preliminary objections as a sword. On jurisdiction, the court applied Owners of the Motor Vessel Lillian S v Caltex Oil and considered the definition of land in Article 260. Although Munyao J in Lydia Nyambura Mbugua v Diamond Trust Bank had held that ELC jurisdiction under the Land Act and Land Registration Act covers charges, the court held itself bound by the recent Court of Appeal decision in Bank of Africa Kenya Ltd v TSS Investment Ltd, which followed Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna, to the effect that disputes over charges, mortgages and the statutory power of sale relate not to the use, occupation or title to land but fall within the High Court's civil jurisdiction. Applying the dominant-issue test, the court found the dispute commercial in nature, upheld the preliminary objection and struck out the matter with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Definition of a preliminary objection

Holding

A preliminary objection is a pure point of law argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the other side are correct, as held in Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd

Reasoning

The court adopted the Supreme Court's restatement in Joho citing Mukisa Biscuit: a preliminary objection consists of a point of law pleaded or arising by clear implication from the pleadings, capable of disposing of the suit, and cannot be raised where facts must be ascertained or judicial discretion exercised. It also cited the IEBC v Cheperenger caution against using a preliminary objection as a sword.

p. 1
02

Whether the ELC has jurisdiction over disputes arising from a formal charge

Holding

The ELC lacks jurisdiction over a dispute concerning the nature of a sale or the terms of a formal charge; such matters are commercial and fall outside the use, occupation and title to land, per Bank of Africa Kenya Ltd v TSS Investment Ltd and Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna

Reasoning

The court followed the Court of Appeal's recent binding decision in Bank of Africa v TSS Investment, which applied Co-operative Bank v Kangethe, holding that a charge is a disposition with no direct contractual relation to the use of a chargor's land, so disputes over charges and the statutory power of sale fall to the High Court's civil jurisdiction. Though section 150 of the Land Act and section 101 of the Land Registration Act confer ELC jurisdiction over matters under those Acts, and Munyao J in Lydia Nyambura Mbugua had read that to cover charges, the later Court of Appeal authority narrows jurisdiction to the dominant issue.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The test for ELC jurisdiction is the dominant issue in the dispute and whether it relates to the environment and the use and occupation of, and title to, land
  • Disputes over mortgages, charges, collection of dues and rents, having no direct contractual relation to the use of land, fall within the civil jurisdiction of the High Court, not the ELC

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is upheld
  2. 2.The matter is struck out with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 162(2) & (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 165(5)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 260
  • Environment and Land Court Act, 2011Section 13
  • Land ActSections 2, 80, 128 and 150
  • Land Registration ActSection 101

Cases cited (10)

  • Hassan Ali Joho & Another vs Suleiman Said Shahbal & 2 Others
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd.
    (1969) EA 696
  • Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission vs Jane Cheperenger & 2 Others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Samuel Kamau Wachira vs KCB & 2 Others
    Civil Application No. 2 of 2012 (eKLR)
  • Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited vs Patrick Kangethe Njuguna & 5 Others
    (2017) eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel M.V Lillian S. vs Caltex Oil (K) Limited
    (1989) KLR 1
  • Lord Bernstein of Leigh vs Skyviews and General Limited
    (1978) QB 479
  • Lydia Nyambura Mbugua vs Diamond Trust Bank Kenya Ltd & Another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Stephen Kibowen vs Agricultural Finance Corporation
    (2015) eKLR
  • Bank of Africa Kenya Limited & another vs TSS Investment Limited & 2 others
    (Civil Appeal E055 of 2022) [2024] KECA 410 (KLR) (26 April 2024)
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution as read with section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011, sections 128 and 150 of the Land Act and section 101 of the Land Registration Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (3)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Masumbuko v National Bank Kenya Ltd (Environment & Land Case 113 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 5454 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). not_stated_in_excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5454/eng@2024-07-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.