Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedMemorandum of Appeal dated 1st February, 2023 (appeal from Webuye PM-ELC Case No. 15 of 2019)· [2024] KEELC 5372 (KLR)

Ngabulo v Hudson Juma Masibo (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of David Nyongesa Masibo - Deceased) (Environment and Land Appeal E008 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5372 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
18 July 2024
2,534 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma from the judgment of 17th January, 2023 in Webuye PM-ELC Case No. 15 of 2019. The trial court had held that the Appellant held 3 acres of parcel Ndivisi/Muchi/622 in trust for the estate of the deceased and directed transfer of title to that estate. The Appellant raised four grounds, consolidated by the court into two: failure to appreciate the law on trusts and inadequate evaluation of the evidence. The court, applying its first appellate mandate under Okeno v Republic, re-evaluated the evidence. It found undisputed that the suit land was originally family land registered in the name of Ngabulo Nato Cornelius; that the deceased, the Appellant's nephew, was allocated, occupied and buried on 3 acres, where his family still resided; and that this evidence was unrebutted. Applying section 25 and section 28(b) of the Land Registration Act and the five elements in Isack M'inanga Kieba v Isaya Theuri M'lintari, the court held that a customary trust over the 3 acres was proved on a balance of probabilities. The trial magistrate was found not to have erred; the appeal was dismissed and, given the parties' family relationship, each party was ordered to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Appellant holds 3 acres of Ndivisi/Muchi/622 in trust for the estate of David Nyongesa Masibo

Holding

Yes; the five elements of customary trust were proved on a balance of probabilities and the trial court's finding was upheld

Reasoning

The evidence that the deceased was allocated, occupied and buried on 3 acres of the suit land was unchallenged. The land was originally family land registered in the grandfather's name; the claimant is family and the claim is against a registered family member. The Appellant did not rebut the evidence of allocation and occupation, so the trust stood proved and the appeal failed.

p. 5
02

Whether the trial magistrate adequately evaluated the evidence

Holding

Yes; no error was established in the trial court's evaluation or application of the law of trusts

Reasoning

The court, re-evaluating the evidence under its first appellate mandate per Okeno v Republic, found the trial magistrate's judgment sound. The Appellant's contentions did not displace the uncontroverted evidence of the deceased's allocation, occupation and burial on the suit land.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A trust is a question of fact and must be proved by credible evidence by the person claiming it
  • Trusts, including customary trusts, are overriding interests under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act, and registration does not relieve a proprietor of trustee obligations
  • The five Isack M'inanga Kieba elements qualify a claimant as a customary trustee and were proved on a balance of probabilities here

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Appellant's appeal is dismissed in its entirety
  2. 2.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration Act No. 3 of 2012Section 25
  • Land Registration Act No. 3 of 2012Section 28

Cases cited (7)

  • Okeno –Vs– Republic
    (1972) EA 32
  • Twalib Hatayan & another v Said Saggar Ahmed Al-Heidy & 5 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Salesio M'itonga v. M'ithara & 3 Others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Gichuki -vs- Gichuki
    Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1981
  • Justus Maina Muruku vs Jane Waithira Mwangi
    [2018] eKLR
  • Mbui Mukangu vs Gerald Mutwiri Mbui
    C.A no. 281 of 2000
  • Isack M'inanga Kieba vs. Isaya Theuri M'lintari & another
    [2018] eKLR
On appeal from
Webuye Principal Magistrate's Court (PM-ELC)
PM-ELC Case No. 15 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over appeals from the magistrates' courts

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngabulo v Hudson Juma Masibo (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of David Nyongesa Masibo - Deceased) (Environment and Land Appeal E008 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5372 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Memorandum of Appeal dated 1st February, 2023 (appeal from Webuye PM-ELC Case No. 15 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/5372/eng@2024-07-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.