Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2024] KEELC 4953 (KLR)

Kisia & another v Kavuludi; Equity Bank Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 2 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 4953 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
13 June 2024
539 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Vihiga (E. Asati, J) disposes of a Notice of Motion dated 5th February 2024 by the Defendant, supported by sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, sections 13(7) and 17 of the Environment and Land Court Act, and Order 25 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The Defendant sought a stay of the present suit pending settlement or payment of party and party costs awarded to him when Hamisi MELC Case No. 2 of 2023 was struck out with costs, arguing that Order 25 Rule 4 bars the 1st Plaintiff from prosecuting a subsequent suit before paying the costs of the earlier one. The 1st Plaintiff opposed through a replying affidavit sworn on 28th February 2024, contending that the bill of costs was still pending assessment so no exact payable figure existed. The court held that Order 25 Rule 4 applies only to suits discontinued or withdrawn by a plaintiff; the prior suit had instead been struck out on the Defendant's preliminary objection, so the Rule was inapplicable. Alternatively, even if it applied, a stay is discretionary and must serve the justice of the case: no unwillingness to pay, no demand and refusal, and no prejudice were demonstrated, and the suit could not be held in abeyance indefinitely awaiting taxation. The application was dismissed with costs to the 1st Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Applicability of Order 25 Rule 4 where the prior suit was struck out

Holding

The Rule does not apply because the prior suit was struck out on the Defendant's preliminary objection, not discontinued or withdrawn by the plaintiff

Reasoning

The court construed Order 25 Rule 4, which governs suits discontinued or withdrawn by a plaintiff. The costs in Hamisi MELC Case No. 2 of 2023 arose from a suit struck out by the court at the Defendant's instance via a preliminary objection. Since the triggering conditions of the Rule were absent, it could not bar the 1st Plaintiff from instituting the present suit.

p. 2
02

Whether the court's discretion favours a stay pending payment of costs

Holding

No stay: costs were unassessed, no demand or refusal to pay was shown, and no prejudice to the applicant was demonstrated

Reasoning

Even assuming the Rule applied, any stay is discretionary and guided by the justice of the case. The bill of costs was pending assessment, so no exact figure was due. There was no evidence that specific costs were demanded and declined. Holding the suit in abeyance indefinitely awaiting taxation would be unjust, and no prejudice to the applicant was shown if the suit proceeded.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Order 25 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules applies only where a suit has been discontinued or withdrawn by the plaintiff, not where it was struck out by the court
  • A subsequent suit cannot be stayed indefinitely pending taxation of unassessed costs where no unwillingness to pay or prejudice is shown

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 5th February 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to the 1st Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1A
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1B
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 3A
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 27
  • Environment and Land Court Actsection 13(7)
  • Environment and Land Court Actsection 17
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 25 Rule 4
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 27 of the Civil Procedure Act; sections 13(7) and 17 of the Environment and Land Court Act; Order 25 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kisia & another v Kavuludi; Equity Bank Limited (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 2 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 4953 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4953/eng@2024-06-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.