Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the extract (ELC suit concerning LR No. 209/17902 and LR No. 209/17536/2)· [2024] KEELC 4950 (KLR)

Kalicha & 5 others (Suing as the officials of Phase II Diamond Estate Association Likoni Road Nairobi) v Regnol Oil Kenya Limited & another; Nairobi City County & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case E136 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 4950 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 June 2024
1,770 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed a residents' association's chosen lawyer stays on record because the rival firm produced no proof it was ever instructed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiffs, officials and members of Phase II Diamond Association (represented by Tim K Njenga & Co. Advocates), filed an application dated 7/06/2024 under Order 2 Rule 15, Order 9 Rules 5 and 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Section 23(2A) of the Advocates Act and Regulation 58 of the LSK Code of Conduct, seeking to strike out a Notice of Change of Advocates dated 13th May 2024 and a Notice of Withdrawal of Suit of even date filed by Abdiaziz Hassan Sheikh T/A Abdiaziz & Company Advocates. The plaintiffs swore they never instructed that firm and that the firm of Tim Njenga & Co. Advocates remained on record. Neither the 1st Defendant's counsel nor Mr Abdiaziz filed a response. The underlying suit concerns alleged irregular dealings with land LR No. 209/17902 and LR No. 209/17536/2. Mogeni J framed two issues: which firm holds the plaintiffs' instructions, and whether Tim Njenga & Co. Advocates were authorised to institute the suit. Noting that an unincorporated association cannot sue in its own name and that its office-holders must litigate representatively (Section 3 Societies Act; Order 1 Rule 8; Living Water Church International v City Council of Nairobi), the court found the 2nd plaintiff's authority, corroborated by the secretary's affidavit, was the only prima facie evidence of instructions, with no equivalent authority for Abdiaziz & Company Advocates. The application succeeded; each party was to bear its own costs and the parties were directed to a Pre Trial Conference on 9/07/2024 before the Deputy Registrar.

Key legal issues

#
01

Which firm of advocates was properly instructed to act for the plaintiffs

Holding

Tim Njenga & Co. Advocates held instructions; Abdiaziz & Company Advocates produced no authority and its documents should not stand

Reasoning

The court compared the two firms' bases of authority. Tim Njenga & Co. instituted the suit with a plaint dated 3/04/2024 and produced an authority signed by the plaintiffs' officials, including the association's secretary, plus the association's registration certificate. The rival firm attached no supporting documentation or association authority. The secretary's sworn evidence corroborated who held instructions, giving the firm on record a prima facie edge.

p. 4
02

Capacity of an unincorporated association to instruct advocates and litigate

Holding

An association under the Societies Act lacks capacity to sue or be sued in its own name; its officials may sue representatively under Order 1 Rule 8

Reasoning

Relying on Section 3 of the Societies Act and Nambuye J's decision in Living Water Church International v City Council of Nairobi, the court held that vindication of the association's rights lies with its office-holders. Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules permits representative suits. Accordingly, it was the officials who instructed Tim Njenga & Co. Advocates to file the suit.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A firm asserting it acts for an association must produce an authority or resolution from the association's officials authorising it to act; absent such authority its filings cannot stand against a firm holding instructions.
  • An unincorporated association cannot sue or be sued in its own name; its rights are vindicated by its office-holders in a representative capacity.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declared that Tim Njenga & Co. Advocates are the advocates on record for the plaintiffs, there being no evidence of appointment of Abdiaziz & Company Advocates
  2. 2.Each party to bear its own costs of the application
  3. 3.Directed parties to attend Pre Trial Conference on 9/07/2024 before the Deputy Registrar

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 2 Rule 15
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 9 Rules 5 and 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 8
  • Advocates Act Cap. 16Section 23(2A)
  • Law Society of Kenya Code of ConductRegulation 58
  • Societies ActSection 3

Cases cited (2)

  • Delphis Bank Limited v Channan Singh Chatthe and 6 others
    NRB CA Civil Appl. no 136 of 2005 [2005] eKLR
  • Living Water Church International vs City Council of Nairobi
    [2008] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 2 Rule 15, Order 9 Rules 5 and 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Section 23(2A) of the Advocates Act Cap. 16, Regulation 58 of the LSK Code of Conduct

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kalicha & 5 others (Suing as the officials of Phase II Diamond Estate Association Likoni Road Nairobi) v Regnol Oil Kenya Limited & another; Nairobi City County & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case E136 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 4950 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the extract (ELC suit concerning LR No. 209/17902 and LR No. 209/17536/2). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4950/eng@2024-06-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.