Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2024] KEELC 4593 (KLR)

Laban & another v Francis (Environment and Land Appeal E020 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 4593 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 June 2024
1,419 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court paused execution of a land decree for just one year, requiring the buyers to deposit their title deed as security within 14 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By an application dated 18 March 2024, Mary Rimaa M'Mugambi and another applicant sought a stay of execution of a judgment and decree delivered on 21 February 2024, pending appeal. The decree cancelled the 2nd applicant's name from the title register, ordered retransfer of the land to the respondent, permanently injuncted the applicants from interfering with the respondent's possession, and lifted an inhibition on the title. The applicants argued they stood to suffer substantial loss, having paid Kshs.1,250,000/- for the land from 2014, that the land risked disposal to third parties rendering the appeal nugatory, that the application was filed timeously, and that they were willing to furnish security. The respondent opposed, contending the application was incompetent because it was filed by a law firm improperly on record, and that substantial loss, timeliness and security were not demonstrated. The court distinguished the Order 9 Rule 9 authority relied on, holding that a party is free to choose counsel before the appellate court and that Order 9 Rule 9 applies only to change of counsel after judgment in the same court. On the merits, the court found the implications of execution profound and undenied, noted the applicants' payment of Kshs.1,250,000/- and their willingness to provide security, and found the application timeous. The court allowed the application, staying execution of the lower court decree for one year only, conditional on the applicants depositing the title deed with the Deputy Registrar within 14 days, failing which the order would lapse, and directed that the lower court file be availed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Representation under Order 9 Rule 9

Holding

The applicants are properly represented before this court

Reasoning

The respondent relied on case law where a law firm not on record at the trial court sought stay of a judgment of that court. Here the applicants engaged counsel before the appellate court, which is their right; Order 9 Rule 9 only restricts change of counsel after judgment within the same court. The authority relied on was distinguished.

p. 2
02

Substantial loss

Holding

Substantial loss was demonstrated

Reasoning

The decree would cancel the 2nd applicant's name from the register and effect retransfer, exposing land for which the applicants paid Kshs.1,250,000/- to disposal by the respondent to third parties. The respondent did not deny the payment or the profound implications of execution, and there was no assurance against onward transfer once the inhibition was lifted.

p. 3
03

Timeliness and security

Holding

The application was filed timeously, within less than a month of judgment, and the applicants were willing to provide and had provided security

Reasoning

The application dated 18.3.2024 followed the judgment of 21.2.2024 by less than a month. The applicants expressed willingness to post security and had already done so on 25.3.2024, satisfying the condition relating to security for due performance of the decree.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules applies only where a law firm wishes to replace a previous one after judgment in the same court; a party is free to engage counsel of choice before the appellate court
  • Execution process alone does not amount to substantial loss; tangible and cogent evidence is required
  • The power to grant a stay is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously on sound and settled principles

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the lower court decree granted for one year only
  2. 2.Applicants to enhance security by depositing the title deed with the Deputy Registrar of the court within 14 days, failing which the order shall lapse
  3. 3.Lower court file to be availed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 9 Rule 9
  • Evidence ActSections 107-112

Cases cited (15)

  • Halal & another v Thorton & Turpin [1963] Ltd
    [1990] eKLR
  • N.M v EMN
    [2019] eKLR
  • Rhoda Mukuma v John Abuoga
    [1988] eKLR
  • Arun C. Sharma v Ashana Raikundalia t/a Raikundalia & Co. advocates & others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal
    [1979] eKLR
  • Stephen M'Ikiamba & others vs John Kiramana Ekabu & others
    Meru ELC Appeal No. E008 of 2020
  • Jennifier Nkirote & another (Meru ELC No. 172 of 2016)
    Meru ELC No. 172 of 2016
  • Samvir Trustee Ltd v Guardian Bank Ltd
    [2007] eKLR
  • Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Health vs Arun & others
    (Civil Application E583 of 2023) [2024] KECA 2 (KLR)
  • Bank Ltd v Norlake Investment Ltd
    [2002] E.A 227
  • Kuko & another v Ali and another Robinson (interested party)
    Civil Application E023 of 2023 [2024] KECA 305 (KLR)
  • Joseph Kithinji Gitonga vs Jenifier Nkiorte & another
  • James Wangalwa v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto
    [2012] eKLR
  • Samvir Trustee Ltd v United Bank Ltd
    [2007] eKLR
  • Iban & 73 others vs Langata Development Co. Ltd & another
    (Civil Application E453 of 2023) KECA 240 (KLR)
On appeal from
Lower court (not specified in judgment)
Jurisdiction invoked
Discretionary power to grant stay pending appeal (the judgment does not cite the specific enabling provision)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Laban & another v Francis (Environment and Land Appeal E020 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 4593 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4593/eng@2024-06-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.