Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2024] KEELC 4474 (KLR)

Machuke & 2 others (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Silas Njeru Njiru - Deceased) v Mukera & another (Environment & Land Case 220 of 2014) [2024] KEELC 4474 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 May 2024
2,026 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court allowed the legal representative of a deceased plaintiff to join a land suit, confirming grants ad litem matter.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Embu on a notice of motion dated 28.02.2023 by Patrick Njiru Gitonga, holder of a limited grant ad litem for the estate of Silas Njeru Njiru, the original 1st plaintiff who died during the pendency of a land suit over parcel Mbeti/Gachoka/1555. The applicant sought joinder as 3rd plaintiff and leave to file pleadings out of time. The 1st and 2nd plaintiffs opposed, contending the applicant was not the deceased's biological son, was a stranger to the estate, and was not a necessary party. The court framed two issues: entitlement to joinder and entitlement to leave to file pleadings out of time. It held that any challenge to the limited grant was a succession matter outside its jurisdiction, and that a grant duly issued by a court confirmed the applicant's competence. Applying Order 1 rule 10(2), the court found the applicant a necessary party whose presence was needed to effectually and completely adjudicate on the issues, since the orders would affect the deceased's estate. It also granted leave to file pleadings out of time, noting the suit had not reached pretrial and no prejudice would ensue, and, invoking sections 1A and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, ordered amendment of the pleadings to include the 3rd plaintiff even though that relief was not expressly sought. The application was allowed as prayed, with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of a party under Order 1 rule 10(2)

Holding

The applicant, as holder of a limited grant ad litem representing the deceased plaintiff's estate, is a necessary party and was joined as 3rd plaintiff.

Reasoning

The court applied the discretionary test in Order 1 rule 10(2): a party may be joined whose presence is necessary to enable the court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all questions in the suit. Because the deceased was originally a plaintiff and died before conclusion, his estate's interests could only be ventilated through his legal representative; the pending orders would affect the estate's interests.

p. 4
02

Leave to file pleadings out of time

Holding

Leave was granted since the suit had not progressed beyond pretrial and no prejudice would be suffered by the other parties.

Reasoning

The court held it fair and in the interest of justice to permit the newly joined party to file pleadings out of time because the suit had not been set down for pretrial, so the other parties could respond. The court also, of its own motion under sections 1A and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, allowed amendment of the pleadings to include the 3rd plaintiff, notwithstanding that this relief was not expressly sought.

p. 4
03

Challenge to the applicant's relationship with the deceased / validity of the limited grant

Holding

The objection was held to be a succession matter outside the court's jurisdiction; the grant having been duly issued by a court was accepted.

Reasoning

The 2nd plaintiff contended the applicant was a stranger and not the deceased's biological son, challenging the limited grant. The court held that any challenge to the grant is a matter for the succession court, as it lacks jurisdiction over it. Since the grant was acquired through a court process, the court was satisfied the applicant was competent to hold it.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A deceased plaintiff's legal representative holding a limited grant is a necessary party whose joinder enables the court to effectually and completely adjudicate on the issues in dispute.
  • Challenges to a limited grant fall within the jurisdiction of the succession court, not the trial court.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Patrick Njiru Gitonga joined as 3rd plaintiff in the suit
  2. 2.Leave granted to file his pleadings out of time
  3. 3.Application allowed as prayed
  4. 4.Costs to be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51 rule 1
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 rule 10(2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 8 rule 3
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1A
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1B
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 3A

Cases cited (9)

  • Tang Gas Distributors Ltd v Said & Others
    (2014) EA 448
  • JMK v MWM & another
    (2015) Eklr
  • Joseph Njau Kingori v Robert Maina Chege & 3 others
    (2002) Eklr
  • Julius Meme v Republic & Anor
    (2004) Eklr Misc Criminal Appl no. 495 of 2003
  • Joseph Ochieng & 2 others trading as Aquiline Agencies v First National Bank of Chicago
    (1995) Eklr
  • Lakhamshi Khimji Shah & Anor v Ajay Shantilal Shah & 2 others
    (2010) Eklr
  • Lucy Nungari Ngigi & 128 others v National Bank of Kenya Ltd & Anor
    (2015) Eklr
  • Attorney Geeral v Kenya Bureau of Standards & Anor
    (2018) Eklr
  • Daniel Kibet Mutai & 9 others v Attorney General
    (2019) Eklr
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 51 rule 1, Order 1 rule 10, Order 8 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules; sections 1A, 1B, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Machuke & 2 others (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Silas Njeru Njiru - Deceased) v Mukera & another (Environment & Land Case 220 of 2014) [2024] KEELC 4474 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4474/eng@2024-05-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.