Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEELC 4098 (KLR)

Nchebere v M’akwalu & 4 others (Environment and Land Appeal E001 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 4098 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 May 2024
2,045 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that once land is registered with title deeds, courts can hear fraud claims—suits dismissed as premature can be revived on appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant sued the respondents by plaint dated 5.3.2022 alleging that they had fraudulently and through corrupt schemes registered themselves as owners of L.R Nos. Meru North/Athinga/Athanja/3543, 1664, 1504 and 5930, and sought cancellation of the title deeds. The respondents denied the claim, asserted indefeasible first registration, counterclaimed for a permanent injunction, and filed a preliminary objection dated 4.7.2022 arguing that the suit offended Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act, was res judicata given Tigania ELC No. 80 of 2017, was incompetent, and that the court lacked jurisdiction because the land was under adjudication. By a ruling dated 16.12.2022 the trial court upheld the objection and dismissed the suit. On first appeal, C K Nzili J re-examined the record. Official searches showed the parcels were registered on 19.1.2015 and title deeds issued, and the respondents' own pleadings admitted a first registration under the Land Registration Act; the land was therefore not subject to the Land Adjudication Act, and the trial court had jurisdiction under Sections 26 and 80 of the Land Registration Act to hear the fraud claim. On res judicata, the respondents pleaded a different previous suit (High Court Misc Application No. 18 of 2008) than that cited in the preliminary objection, and produced no pleadings, judgments or decrees; proving res judicata required evidence and could not succeed as a preliminary objection. The court also noted the trial court left the respondents' counterclaim in limine. Allowing the appeal, the court held the preliminary objection lacked merit and awarded costs to the appellant. Orders were dated, signed and delivered at Meru on 15th May 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction over land formerly under adjudication

Holding

The suit parcels were already titled under the Land Registration Act, so the trial court had jurisdiction over the fraud/corrupt scheme claim

Reasoning

Official searches attached to the plaint showed the parcels were registered and title deeds issued on 19.1.2015, and the respondents' defence admitted a first registration under the Land Registration Act. The land was no longer subject to the Land Adjudication Act, so the ouster and consent requirements for adjudication-section disputes did not apply.

p. 4
02

Res judicata

Holding

The res judicata plea failed; no conclusive decree was pleaded or produced and the pleaded previous suit (High Court Misc Application No. 18 of 2008) was not mentioned in the preliminary objection as Tigania ELC No. 80 of 2017

Reasoning

Res judicata requires that the same issues were determined to finality between the same parties. The respondents did not attach pleadings, judgments or decrees from the earlier suits, and proving the plea required evidence, making it unsuitable for a preliminary objection. The court found no conclusive decree previously determined the fraud claim.

p. 4
03

Unaddressed counterclaim

Holding

The trial court erred in failing to determine whether the respondents' counterclaim survived the finding of lack of jurisdiction

Reasoning

Once the trial court found it had no jurisdiction over the primary suit, it left unresolved whether the respondents' counterclaim also stood before it without jurisdiction, an inconsistency indicating the preliminary objection was improperly sustained.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A first appellate court must reanalyze and re-appraise the lower court record and come up with independent findings on facts and law
  • A court's jurisdiction flows from the Constitution or statute and cannot be conferred by consent of parties or judicial craftsmanship
  • Once title deeds have been issued and the parcels fall under the Land Registration Act, the court has jurisdiction under Sections 26 and 80 to entertain claims of fraud and corrupt scheme in the registration
  • A preliminary objection cannot be sustained where contested facts require proof by evidence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is allowed with costs to the appellant
  2. 2.The ruling of the trial court dated 16.12.2022 upholding the preliminary objection and dismissing the suit is overturned

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 78
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Land Adjudication ActCap 284, Section 30(1)(2)
  • Land Registration ActSections 26 and 80

Cases cited (17)

  • Mukhisa Biscuit Manufacturing Ltd vs West End Distributors
    (1969) E.A 696
  • IEBC & others vs Maina Kiai & others
    (2017) eKLR
  • C.K Bett Traders Ltd & others vs Kennedy Mwangi & another
    (2021) eKLR
  • Peters vs Sunday Post Ltd
    (1958) E.A 424
  • Selle & another vs Associated Motor Boat Ltd & another
    (1968) E.A 123
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel "Lillian S" vs Caltex Oil (K) Ltd
    (1989) eKLR
  • Equity Bank Ltd vs Bruce Mutie t/a Diani Tour Travel
    (2016) eKLR
  • Bhaijee & another vs Nondi & another
    (Civil Appeal No. 139 of 2019) (2022) KECA 119 (KLR)
  • Tobias Achola Osidi & others vs Cyprianus Otieno Ogalo & others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Julia Kaburia vs Kabeera & others
    Nyeri Civil Appeal No. 340 of 2002
  • Lepore Ole Maito vs Letwat Kortom & others
    (2016) eKLR
  • Mugambi & others vs Rutere & others
    (Environment and Land Case No. 27 of 2018) (2022) KEELC 15358 (KLR)
  • Mary Wangui Muthoga vs Samuel Ndugu Chege & another
    (2016) eKLR
  • Bandi vs Dzomo & 76 others
    Civil Appeal 16 of 2020 (2022) KECA 584 (KLR)
  • Munyu Maina vs Hiram Gathiha Maina
    (2013) eKLR
  • IEBC & others vs Jane Chepenger & others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Suleiman Said Shabhal vs IEBC & others
    (2014) eKLR
On appeal from
Trial court (ELC/magistrates' court, Tigania)
Tigania ELC suit founded on plaint dated 5.3.2022
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal under Section 78 of the Civil Procedure Act (reanalysis and re-appraisal of the lower court record)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nchebere v M’akwalu & 4 others (Environment and Land Appeal E001 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 4098 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4098/eng@2024-05-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.