Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedBusia ELC Case No E005 of 2020 (OS) consolidated with Busia ELC Case No 111 of 2019· [2024] KEELC 3909 (KLR)

Pamba & 2 others v Barasa & 3 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2020 & Environment & Land Case 111 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 3909 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 April 2024
4,509 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~18 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Busia court ruled that 20 years of open occupation let a buyer own land by adverse possession, even against heirs who later got the title deed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Two consolidated suits (Busia ELC E005 of 2020 (OS) and Busia ELC 111 of 2019, consolidated by Omollo J on 7th July 2022) were decided together. The Plaintiff claimed half an acre of parcel South Teso/Angoromo/7322 by adverse possession, having purchased one acre from the late Silvester Opiyo under a sale agreement dated 10th August 1999 for Kshs.120,000 fully paid. He took possession in 1999 and cultivated it until 2019 when the local administration, at the Defendants' instance, stopped him. The Defendants, daughters of the deceased who were minors at his death, obtained a confirmed grant in Succession Cause No 344 of 2017 and were registered on 22nd August 2018; they sued for a permanent injunction in ELC 111 of 2019 (their plaint becoming the counter-claim upon consolidation). The court framed three issues and, applying Kasuve v Mwaani Investments, Kimani Ruchine v Swift Rutherford, Grace Wairimu Sorora v Chaka Ltd and Public Trustee v Wanduru, found 20 years of open, peaceful and uninterrupted possession, well beyond the 12-year statutory period. Registration by transmission did not defeat the accrued right; adverse possession is an overriding interest under Section 28(h) of the Land Registration Act, so the Defendants held in trust for the Plaintiff. The 2019 suit came too late to interrupt limitation. The counter-claim was dismissed with costs; judgment was entered for the Plaintiff declaring his adverse possession, ordering surrender and cancellation of the title, execution of transfer documents (with the Deputy Registrar empowered in default), vacant possession, a permanent injunction, and costs against the Defendants. Judgment delivered by electronic mail on 24th April 2024, with an apology for delay due to the judge's bereavement.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff acquired half an acre of parcel South Teso/Angoromo/7322 by adverse possession

Holding

Yes - possession from 1999 to 2019 (20 years) was open, peaceful, continuous and uninterrupted, exceeding the 12-year statutory period

Reasoning

The Plaintiff entered as a purchaser under a sale agreement dated 10th August 1999, fully paid Kshs.120,000 and took possession. His occupation continued until 2019 when the local administration stopped him. The 1st Defendant admitted in cross-examination that the Plaintiff used the land until 2019. Two witnesses confirmed the occupation. By the time of eviction he had exceeded the 12-year period, so his right had ripened and the subsequent 2019 suit could not interrupt it.

p. 7
02

Whether the Defendants, as registered proprietors via succession transmission, were entitled to injunct the Plaintiff

Holding

No - their interest had been extinguished by adverse possession before registration; the counter-claim was dismissed

Reasoning

The Grant was confirmed on 15th December 2017 and the Defendants registered on 22nd August 2018, but by then the deceased's and their interest had long been extinguished because the Plaintiff's 12 years expired around 2011. Adverse possession is an overriding interest under Section 28(h) of the Land Registration Act. They therefore held the title in trust for the Plaintiff and could not obtain an injunction against him or against Opama Emaase Juvenalis.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • A purchaser in possession who has fully paid the purchase price is a party in whose favour the limitation period can run to justify adverse possession
  • Adverse possession requires exclusive, open, peaceful and uninterrupted possession for 12 years, without force, stealth or permission (nec vi, nec clam, nec precario)
  • Registration obtained by transmission does not defeat a claim of adverse possession that has already accrued; the registered proprietor holds in trust for the adverse possessor

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendants' counter-claim is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff; Opama Emaase Juvenalis is not entitled to any costs.
  2. 2.Judgment for the Plaintiff: the Defendants' rights over land parcel No South Teso/Angoromo/7322 have been extinguished by operation of the law and the Plaintiff has acquired the parcel by way of adverse possession.
  3. 3.The Defendants shall within 45 days deliver the original title deed to the Land Registrar Busia for cancellation and execute all necessary documents to facilitate registration in the Plaintiff's name.
  4. 4.In default, the Deputy Registrar Busia shall cancel the title and the Deputy Registrar of the Court shall execute the documents on behalf of the Defendants.
  5. 5.The Defendants shall forthwith give vacant possession of land parcel No South Teso/Angoromo/7322 to the Plaintiff.
  6. 6.The Defendants, their agents, servants, family members and all parties acting through them are injuncted from interfering with the Plaintiff's use of the land parcel.
  7. 7.The Defendants shall meet the Plaintiff's costs of his suit.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesSection 38(1) and (2) (as cited in the judgment; substantively the Limitation of Actions Act provisions)
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 38
  • Land Registration ActSection 28(h)

Cases cited (4)

  • Kasuve v Mwaani Investments Ltd & Another
    2004 1 KLR 184
  • Kimani Ruchine -v- Swift Rutherford & Co. Ltd
    1980 KLR 10
  • Grace Wairimu Sorora v Chaka Ltd & Others
    2017 eKLR
  • Public Trustee v Wanduru
    1984 KLR 314
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 38(1) and (2) of the Limitation of Actions Act / Section 38 of the Civil Procedure Rules - application for an order that a person entitled by adverse possession be registered as proprietor

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Pamba & 2 others v Barasa & 3 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2020 & Environment & Land Case 111 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 3909 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Busia ELC Case No E005 of 2020 (OS) consolidated with Busia ELC Case No 111 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3909/eng@2024-04-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.