Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedAppeal from CMCC No. 618 of (Mombasa)· [2024] KEELC 3706 (KLR)

Jiwa & another v Jiwa (Suing as a Trustee of Kulsumbhai Trust) & another (Environment and Land Appeal 6 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3706 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
25 April 2024
1,911 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal from the judgment of the Chief Magistrate's Court at Mombasa (Hon. JM. Nang'ea CM, delivered 27th February 2018 in CMCC No. 618), in which the respondents, suing as trustees of Kulsumbai Trust, obtained orders compelling the appellants (their tenants and relatives) to give vacant possession of a flat on Mombasa/Block XXVII/22 and to pay mesne profits of Kshs 10,000 per month from December 2009 until vacant possession. The appellants challenged the trial court's jurisdiction, the respondents' locus standi, the validity of the notice to terminate tenancy, and the award of mesne profits, and sought dismissal of the suit with costs. The 2nd appellant died during the appeal and the appeal proceeded against the 1st appellant only. Matheka J restated the duties of a first appellate court, citing Mbogo v Shah, Gitobu Imanyara v Attorney General and Mwanasokoni v Kenya Bus Service. On res judicata, the court held that the earlier Rent Tribunal matter and HCC No. 84 of 2005 concerned assessment of rent, a cause of action substantially different from vacant possession and mesne profits, and the earlier appeal had been withdrawn, so the doctrine did not bar the suit. On standing, the 1st respondent's general power of attorney from the 2nd respondent sufficed. The court found no malice in the notice and upheld the mesne profits award. Concluding the judgment was based on cogent evidence, the court dismissed the appeal with costs to the respondents on 25th April 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata

Holding

The doctrine did not apply because the Rent Tribunal matter concerned assessment of rent whereas the trial suit concerned vacant possession and mesne profits, and the earlier appeal had been withdrawn

Reasoning

The court compared the causes of action in the two matters. The Tribunal matter was for assessment of rent of Kshs 10,000; the CMCC suit sought vacant possession and mesne profits. The issues were substantially different and the earlier appeal had been withdrawn with no evidence to the contrary. The trial court therefore had jurisdiction.

p. 4
02

Locus standi

Holding

The 1st respondent, holding a general power of attorney donated by the 2nd respondent, had sufficient locus standi to pursue the claim

Reasoning

Evidence showed the 1st respondent was appointed attorney by the 2nd respondent and produced the power of attorney; he was not suing as trustee. This sufficed to give him standing, and the ground of appeal on locus standi failed.

p. 4
03

Validity of notice to terminate tenancy and mesne profits

Holding

The notice dated 5th October 2009 was validly served and the appellants, being tenants in occupation, were properly liable to pay mesne profits of Kshs 10,000 per month until vacant possession

Reasoning

Service of the 30-day notice was proved (Pex 3). The plaintiffs intended to sell for beneficiaries, some of whom included the defendants, so no malice was found. Tenancy and payment of rent were not in contention, justifying mesne profits at Kshs 10,000 per month until vacant possession.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • On a first appeal the court re-evaluates the evidence and reaches its own conclusions but will not interfere with findings of fact based on cogent evidence
  • Parties cannot evade the doctrine of res judicata by merely adding other parties or causes of action in a subsequent suit

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed for lack of merit
  2. 2.Costs awarded to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21Section 7

Cases cited (7)

  • Mbogo and another v Shah
    [1968] EA 93
  • Gitobu Imanyara & 2 others v Attorney General
    [2016] eKLR
  • Njangu v Wambugu and another
    Nairobi HCCC No.2340 of 1991 (unreported)
  • Christopher Kenyariri v Salama Beach
    [2017] eKLR
  • E.T v Attorney General & Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Omondi v National Bank of Kenya Limited and Others
    [2001] EA 177
  • Mwanasokoni v Kenya Bus Service
    [1982 - 88] 1 KAR 870
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court Mombasa
CMCC No. 618
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the Chief Magistrate's Court (Civil Procedure Act Cap 21; Section 7 on res judicata considered)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jiwa & another v Jiwa (Suing as a Trustee of Kulsumbhai Trust) & another (Environment and Land Appeal 6 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3706 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Appeal from CMCC No. 618 of (Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3706/eng@2024-04-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.