Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2024] KEELC 3648 (KLR)

Josephine Kagiri v M'Mwirichia M'Guatu & Another

Environment and Land Court
18 January 2024
1,126 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court cannot grant an injunction to protect land pending your own appeal against its judgment; only the Court of Appeal can.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, Josephine Kagiri, moved the Environment and Land Court at Meru by Notice of Motion dated September 4, 2023 seeking a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing on, occupying, fencing, cultivating on, selling, leasing or subdividing a half-acre portion of KIIRUA/NAARI-MAITEI/505 pending her intended appeal to the Court of Appeal against the court's own judgment of July 12, 2023 dismissing her case with costs. She argued she would suffer irreparable loss and the appeal would be rendered nugatory. The 1st respondent, M'Mwirichia M'Guatu, did not oppose, noting the applicant occupies the land as her home and supporting maintenance of the status quo. The 2nd respondent, Cecerina Karoki M'Guatu, opposed, pointing out that no appeal had been lodged and no stay granted. The court framed three issues: jurisdiction, the applicable principles, and whether to grant the injunction. Holding that Order 40 was inapplicable and that Order 42 Rule 6(6) empowers the court only when sitting in appellate jurisdiction over a subordinate court, Judge C. Yano found that having delivered judgment the court became functus officio and could not grant an injunction pending an appeal against its own decision, following Bartholomew Mwanyungu, Tahir Sheikh Said Investments and Chembe Katana Changi. The motion was dismissed with costs to the 2nd defendant, with liberty to pursue the Court of Appeal under Rule 5(2)(b).

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant a temporary injunction pending an appeal against its own judgment

Holding

It does not; Order 42 Rule 6(6) applies only where the court sits in appellate jurisdiction over a subordinate court or tribunal. Having rendered judgment on July 12, 2023, the court became functus officio.

Reasoning

Order 42 Rule 6(6) empowers the High Court to grant a temporary injunction in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction provided the procedure for appeal from a subordinate court is complied with. The plaintiff sought an injunction pending appeal against this court's own judgment, so the rule is inapplicable. Relying on Bartholomew Mwanyungu, Tahir Sheikh Said Investments and Chembe Katana Changi, once judgment is rendered the court is functus officio; the plaintiff must move the Court of Appeal under Rule 5(2)(b).

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A trial court that has delivered judgment becomes functus officio and cannot grant a temporary injunction pending an appeal against its own decision; the proper forum is the appellate court under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Notice of Motion dated September 4, 2023 dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the 2nd defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 63(c) and (e)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 Rules 1, 2, 3 & 4
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6(6)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 50(1), 159(2)(d)
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)

Cases cited (3)

  • Bartholomew Mwanyungu & 3 Others v Florence Dean Karimi
    [2019] eKLR
  • Tahir Sheikh Said Investments Limited v Administration, TSS Grain Millers & 2 Others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Chembe Katana Changi v Ministry of Lands & Settlement & 4 others
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63(c) and (e) of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 40 Rules 1, 2, 3 & 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules; Articles 50(1) and 159(2)(d) of the Constitution; considered under Order 42 Rule 6(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Josephine Kagiri v M'Mwirichia M'Guatu & Another", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3648/eng@2024-01-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.